Long Peng

64 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers

Long Peng
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 70
  • Pharmacology 53
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 94
  • Nephrology 31
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 99
Replace Xiaohui Ma with:
Xiaohui Ma China
Jinfa Tang China
Ying Wen China
Yuchao Feng China
Sharron Stewart United States
Robert Lowe United States
Lan Zhou China
K. Shimamura Japan
Sanni Kumar India
Long Peng relative to Xiaohui Ma China Xiaohui Ma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Xiaohui Ma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Long Peng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Long Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Long Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Long Peng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Long Peng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Long Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Long Peng. The network helps show where Long Peng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Long Peng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Long Peng Line = papers co-authored together Long Peng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201343
2 201437
3 201333
4 200831
5 201928
6 201626
7 200824
8 201322
9 200822
10 202021
11 201921
12 201519
13 200918
14 201416
15 201315
16 202114
17 201513
18 201612
19 201512
20 201412

About Long Peng

Long Peng is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Immunology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 71 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties of Alloys (10 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (8 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (7 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (6 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (6 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (6 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (5 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (70 citations), Pharmacology (53 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (94 citations), Nephrology (31 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (99 citations). Long Peng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Suhua Li, Xiaoyan Gao, Huaiwu Zhang, Mingxing Guo, John Q. Xiao, Xixiang Tang, Haiyu Liu, Yanting Luo, Yuanqiang Song and Zhang Li. Their work appears in journals such as Cardiovascular Diabetology, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Transfusion, Journal of Rare Earths and International Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact