Citations per year, relative to Loizos Michael Loizos Michael (= 1×)
peers
Anke van Zuylen
Countries citing papers authored by Loizos Michael
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Loizos Michael's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loizos Michael with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loizos Michael more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loizos Michael. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loizos Michael. The network helps show where Loizos Michael may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Loizos Michael
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Loizos Michael.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Loizos Michael based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Loizos Michael. Loizos Michael is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kakas, Antonis, Loizos Michael, & Francesca Toni. (2016). Argumentation: Reconciling Human and Automated Reasoning.. Spiral (Imperial College London). 43–60.2 indexed citations
4.
Michael, Loizos. (2015). Introspective forecasting. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3714–3720.
5.
Diakidoy, Irene‐Anna N., Antonis Kakas, Loizos Michael, & Rob Miller. (2015). STAR: A System of Argumentation for Story Comprehension and Beyond.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 64–70.3 indexed citations
6.
Michael, Loizos. (2015). Jumping to conclusions. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 43–49.1 indexed citations
7.
Diakidoy, Irene‐Anna N., Antonis Kakas, Loizos Michael, & Rob Miller. (2014). A psychology-inspired approach to automated narrative text comprehension. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 610–613.
8.
Michael, Loizos. (2014). Simultaneous learning and prediction. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 348–357.8 indexed citations
9.
Michael, Loizos, et al.. (2013). An empirical investigation of ceteris paribus learnability. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1537–1543.5 indexed citations
Dimopoulos, Yannis, et al.. (2009). Ceteris Paribus preference elicitation with predictive guarantees. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1890–1895.27 indexed citations
17.
Michael, Loizos. (2009). Reading between the lines. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1525–1530.14 indexed citations
18.
Mavronicolas, Marios, Loizos Michael, & Paul G. Spirakis. (2008). Computing on a partially eponymous ring. Theoretical Computer Science. 410(6-7). 595–613.1 indexed citations
19.
Michael, Loizos & Leslie G. Valiant. (2008). A first experimental demonstration of massive knowledge infusion. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 17(4). 378–388.18 indexed citations
20.
Michael, Loizos. (2007). Learning from partial observations. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 968–974.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.