Citations per year, relative to Antonis Kakas Antonis Kakas (= 1×)
peers
Michael Benedikt
Countries citing papers authored by Antonis Kakas
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Antonis Kakas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonis Kakas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonis Kakas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonis Kakas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonis Kakas. The network helps show where Antonis Kakas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antonis Kakas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antonis Kakas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antonis Kakas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Antonis Kakas. Antonis Kakas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kakas, Antonis, et al.. (2021). Cognitive Argumentation and the Selection Task. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 43(43).2 indexed citations
5.
Karafili, Erisa, Antonis Kakas, Nikolaos I. Spanoudakis, & Emil Lupu. (2017). Argumentation-Based Security for Social Good.. Spiral (Imperial College London). 164–170.4 indexed citations
6.
Kakas, Antonis, Loizos Michael, & Francesca Toni. (2016). Argumentation: Reconciling Human and Automated Reasoning.. Spiral (Imperial College London). 43–60.2 indexed citations
7.
Diakidoy, Irene‐Anna N., Antonis Kakas, Loizos Michael, & Rob Miller. (2015). STAR: A System of Argumentation for Story Comprehension and Beyond.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 64–70.3 indexed citations
8.
Diakidoy, Irene‐Anna N., Antonis Kakas, Loizos Michael, & Rob Miller. (2014). A psychology-inspired approach to automated narrative text comprehension. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 610–613.
9.
Kakas, Antonis, et al.. (2004). Declarative agent control. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa).
10.
Kakas, Antonis, Paolo Mancarella, Fariba Sadri, Kostas Stathis, & Francesca Toni. (2004). The KGP model of agency. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 28–32.41 indexed citations
Kakas, Antonis, et al.. (2004). Frame consistency: computing with causal explanations.. 79–87.5 indexed citations
13.
Kakas, Antonis, et al.. (2004). Agent planning, negotiation and control of operation. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 13–17.7 indexed citations
14.
Kakas, Antonis, Bert Van Nuffelen, & Marc Denecker. (2001). A-system: problem solving through abduction. Lirias (KU Leuven). 591–596.39 indexed citations
15.
Flach, Peter & Antonis Kakas. (1998). Abduction and Induction in AI: Report of the IJCAI'97 Workshop. Logic Journal of IGPL. 6. 651–656.7 indexed citations
16.
Kakas, Antonis, et al.. (1997). Reasoning about Actions, Narratives and Ramification.. 1. 39–72.5 indexed citations
Kakas, Antonis & Paolo Mancarella. (1991). Negation as Stable Hypotheses.. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 87(3-4). 275–288.10 indexed citations
20.
Kakas, Antonis & Paolo Mancarella. (1990). Generalized stable models: a semantics for abduction. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 385–391.94 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.