Lloyd K. Sines
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Helen SimmonsJacob O. SinesDavid R. OwenJerome D. PaukerJoseph WestermeyerRichard L. PyleJerome KrollCharles S. Newmark
- Topics
- Psychological Testing and Assessment (6 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologySchizophrenia Bulletin
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Lloyd K. Sines
17 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Clinical Psychology 188
- Social Psychology 74
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 68
- Psychiatry and Mental health 59
- Applied Psychology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Lloyd K. Sines
This map shows the geographic impact of Lloyd K. Sines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lloyd K. Sines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lloyd K. Sines more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lloyd K. Sines
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lloyd K. Sines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lloyd K. Sines. The network helps show where Lloyd K. Sines may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lloyd K. Sines
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lloyd K. Sines. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lloyd K. Sines based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lloyd K. Sines. Lloyd K. Sines is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 92 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 63 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 44 |
About Lloyd K. Sines
Lloyd K. Sines is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Family Practice and General Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (52 citations), Clinical Psychology (188 citations) and General Psychology (9 citations). Lloyd K. Sines has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Helen Simmons, Jacob O. Sines, David R. Owen, Jerome D. Pauker, Joseph Westermeyer, Richard L. Pyle, Jerome Kroll, Charles S. Newmark, Pi‐Nian Chang and Robert O. Fisch. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Schizophrenia Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.