Lloyd Balbuena
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rudy BowenMarilyn BaetzEvyn M. PetersYu‐Tao XiangSteven MarwahaQinge ZhangRaymond TempierG. Camelia Adams
- Topics
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (17 papers)Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (16 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Lloyd Balbuena
76 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Clinical Psychology 785
- Psychiatry and Mental health 355
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 351
- Social Psychology 274
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 206
Countries citing papers authored by Lloyd Balbuena
This map shows the geographic impact of Lloyd Balbuena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lloyd Balbuena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lloyd Balbuena more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lloyd Balbuena
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lloyd Balbuena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lloyd Balbuena. The network helps show where Lloyd Balbuena may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lloyd Balbuena
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lloyd Balbuena. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lloyd Balbuena based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lloyd Balbuena. Lloyd Balbuena is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Lloyd Balbuena
Lloyd Balbuena is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (17 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (16 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (785 citations), Biological Psychiatry (88 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (351 citations). Lloyd Balbuena has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rudy Bowen, Marilyn Baetz, Evyn M. Peters, Yu‐Tao Xiang, Steven Marwaha, Qinge Zhang, Raymond Tempier, G. Camelia Adams, Xiangfei Meng and Gordon J. G. Asmundson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.