L.J. Winton

2.7k citations
5 papers · 201 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

L.J. Winton

4 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers

L.J. Winton
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Hardware and Architecture 94
  • Information Systems and Management 63
  • Computer Networks and Communications 191
  • Information Systems 97
  • Management Science and Operations Research 7
Replace Anthony Mayer with:
Anthony Mayer United Kingdom
R. Carvajal-Schiaffino Italy
Sergio Andreozzi Italy
Pierre Delisle Canada
Felipe Bertrand United States
Mathilde Romberg Germany
Wolfgang Hoschek Switzerland
Benjamin Gaidioz Switzerland
M. Sgaravatto Italy
Gergely Sipos Hungary
L.J. Winton relative to Anthony Mayer United Kingdom Anthony Mayer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anthony Mayer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L.J. Winton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.J. Winton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.J. Winton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.J. Winton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.J. Winton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.J. Winton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.J. Winton. The network helps show where L.J. Winton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside L.J. Winton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L.J. Winton Line = papers co-authored together L.J. Winton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 2004102
2 200589
3 20039
4
CERN WEST AREA NEUTRINO FACILITY BEAM LINE ALIGNMENT
19961
5 20170

About L.J. Winton

L.J. Winton is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture, Information Systems and Management, Information Systems and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 5 papers that have together received 201 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (4 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (4 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (2 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (1 paper), Superconducting Materials and Applications (1 paper), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (1 paper), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (1 paper) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (94 citations), Information Systems and Management (63 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (191 citations), Information Systems (97 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (7 citations). L.J. Winton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Srikumar Venugopal, Rajkumar Buyya, H. Plothow-Besch, A. Guglielmi, G. de Rijk, M G Catanesi and E. Tsesmelis. Their work appears in journals such as Space Science Reviews, Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience, CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) and Figshare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact