Liz Ellis

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 619 citations indexed

About

Liz Ellis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Liz Ellis has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 619 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Liz Ellis's work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). Liz Ellis is often cited by papers focused on COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). Liz Ellis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Liz Ellis's co-authors include Mark Grindle, Rob Polson, Stephen J Leslie, Helen Ann Latham, Chris O’Malley, Johannes H. De Kock, Yiannis Kyratsis, Eamonn McKeown, Kenneth Lynch and Brian K. Payne and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, Public Health and Health Expectations.

In The Last Decade

Liz Ellis

17 papers receiving 598 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being

2021 540 citations Johannes H. De Kock, Helen Ann Latham et al. BMC Public Health profile →

Peers

Liz Ellis

CP

GHP

EE

ONCOL

SP

Maryam Vizheh Iran

Gaia Perego Italy

Sonia Monique Bramanti Italy

Lan Deng China

Josephine Yau Hong Kong

Imene Ghoul Jordan

Supriya Mahant India

Yifat Findling Israel

Meghana Kakade United States

Maryam Vizheh Iran

Liz Ellis

412 ×1.0

CP

304 ×0.8

GHP

82 ×1.0

EE

56 ×0.7

ONCOL

89 ×1.3

SP

Citations per year, relative to Liz Ellis Liz Ellis (= 1×) peers Maryam Vizheh

Countries citing papers authored by Liz Ellis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liz Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liz Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liz Ellis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liz Ellis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liz Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liz Ellis. The network helps show where Liz Ellis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liz Ellis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liz Ellis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liz Ellis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liz Ellis. Liz Ellis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

1.

Macaden, Leah, et al.. (2025). Dignity and Human Rights—Survey Findings on Undergraduate Nursing Students' Conceptualisation and Operationalisation of Dignity. Nursing Open. 12(4). e70194–e70194.

2.

Locock, Louise, Deirdre O’Donnell, Sarah Donnelly, et al.. (2022). ‘Language has been granted too much power’.^1,p.1 Challenging the power of words with time and flexibility in the precommencement stage of research involving those with cognitive impairment. Health Expectations. 25(6). 2609–2613. 6 indexed citations

3.

Kock, Johannes H. De, Helen Ann Latham, Stephen J Leslie, et al.. (2021). A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being. BMC Public Health. 21(1). 104–104. 540 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Ellis, Liz, et al.. (2020). Creating Community and Belonging in a Designated Housing Estate for Disabled People. Social Inclusion. 8(3). 66–76. 2 indexed citations

5.

Kock, Johannes H. De, Helen Ann Latham, Stephen J Leslie, et al.. (2020). A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being . Research Square. 2 indexed citations

6.

Kock, Johannes H. De, Helen Ann Latham, Stephen J Leslie, et al.. (2020). A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of health and social care workers: implications for psychological interventions. Research Square. 2 indexed citations

7.

Ellis, Liz, et al.. (2019). Participatory autism research with students at a UK university: evidence from a small-scale empirical project. Advances in Autism. 5(2). 84–93. 5 indexed citations

8.

Crone, Diane, et al.. (2019). ‘It’s a whole cultural shift’: understanding learning in cultural commissioning from a qualitative process evaluation. Cardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University). 3(1). 17–36. 1 indexed citations

9.

Douglas, Graeme, et al.. (2019). A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the effectiveness of educational interventions to support children and young people with vision impairment. 1 indexed citations

10.

Ellis, Liz, et al.. (2019). Dispute resolution, legal reasoning and good governance: learning lessons from appeals on selection in sport. European Sport Management Quarterly. 20(5). 560–576. 12 indexed citations

11.

Lynch, Kenneth, et al.. (2018). Are Police-Led Social Crime Prevention Initiatives Effective? A Process and Outcome Evaluation of a UK Youth Intervention. International Criminal Justice Review. 31(3). 325–346. 9 indexed citations

12.

Ellis, Liz, et al.. (2017). Gloucestershire Active Together Evaluation: Final Report. 1 indexed citations

13.

Ellis, Liz. (2017). Making decisions together? Exploring the decision-making process in an inclusive research project. Disability & Society. 33(3). 454–475. 18 indexed citations

14.

McKeown, Eamonn, et al.. (2015). Art engagement and mental health: experiences of service users of a community-based arts programme at Tate Modern, London. Public Health. 130. 29–35. 13 indexed citations

15.

Ellis, Liz, Graeme Douglas, & Harriet Clarke. (2015). Experiences of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for people with sensory loss: Research Findings 48. 2 indexed citations

16.

Ellis, Liz, et al.. (2015). The creation of interactive activity pods at a Recycling Education Centre. Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit. 30(3). 370–381. 2 indexed citations

17.

Ellis, Liz. (2015). The Experiences of People with Learning Difficulties Living in a Rural Area. 1 indexed citations

18.

Ellis, Liz, et al.. (2013). Testing for Turkeys: A Novel Nurse-Led, Faith-Based Community HIV-Testing Initiative. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 24(6). 579–581. 1 indexed citations

19.

Ellis, Liz, et al.. (1998). Liberated by Employment?. 2(1). 6–10. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact