Liz Day
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Health top 5%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Papers in
-
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 6
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression 2
-
- Resilience and Mental Health 4
- Personality Traits and Psychology 3
- Co-authors
- John Maltby (15 shared papers)Christopher Alan Lewis (1 shared paper)Alex M. Wood (4 shared papers)Carmel Proctor (1 shared paper)Katie Hanson (1 shared paper)Sophie Hall (2 shared papers)Diana C. G. A. Pinto (1 shared paper)Lynn E. McCutcheon (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Personality and Individual Differences (5 papers)British Journal of Psychology (2 papers)British Journal of Health Psychology (1 paper)Assessment (1 paper)Consciousness and Cognition (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Liz Day
15 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Applied Psychology 111
- Health 112
- Clinical Psychology 206
- Social Psychology 199
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Liz Day
This map shows the geographic impact of Liz Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liz Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liz Day more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liz Day
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liz Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liz Day. The network helps show where Liz Day may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liz Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 141 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 116 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 5 |
About Liz Day
Liz Day is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Health and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (4 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (111 citations), Health (112 citations), Clinical Psychology (206 citations), Social Psychology (199 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations). Liz Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Maltby, Christopher Alan Lewis, Alex M. Wood, Carmel Proctor, Katie Hanson, Sophie Hall, Diana C. G. A. Pinto, Lynn E. McCutcheon, Matthew M. Martin and Jacob L. Cayanus. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, British Journal of Psychology, British Journal of Health Psychology, Assessment and Consciousness and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.