Liu–Fang Cheng
- Hepatology top 5%
- Surgery
- Epidemiology
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Cell Biology
- Topics
- Liver Disease and Transplantation (6 papers)Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers)Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaMalaysiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Liu–Fang Cheng
17 papers receiving 341 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Hepatology 202
- Surgery 184
- Epidemiology 165
- Gastroenterology 89
- Cell Biology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Liu–Fang Cheng
This map shows the geographic impact of Liu–Fang Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liu–Fang Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liu–Fang Cheng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liu–Fang Cheng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liu–Fang Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liu–Fang Cheng. The network helps show where Liu–Fang Cheng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liu–Fang Cheng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liu–Fang Cheng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liu–Fang Cheng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liu–Fang Cheng. Liu–Fang Cheng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 85 | |
| 3 | 116 | |
| 4 | [Consensus on the clinical significance and evaluation of common liver biochemistry tests]. | 1 |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | Esophagogastric variceal bleeding in cirrhotic portal hypertension: consensus on prevention and management (2008). | 10 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Endoscopic and pathological characteristics of Barrett's esophagus | 1 |
| 9 | [Intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes in cirrhosis: experiment with rats]. | 1 |
| 10 | 57 | |
| 11 | Effect of photodynamic reaction and sclerosant on venous endothelial cells | 1 |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | Hematopoietic-supportive effect of (2S, 3R)-ent-catechin on marrow-depressed mice. | 2 |
| 14 | Intraductal ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct stones: a comparative study. | 6 |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | Study on relationship between ras, p16, p53, helicobacter pylori and gastric carcinoma | 1 |
| 17 | Experience in sclerotherapy for esophagogastric variceal bleeding. | 4 |
About Liu–Fang Cheng
Liu–Fang Cheng is a scholar working on Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 17 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease and Transplantation (6 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (202 citations), Gastroenterology (89 citations) and Epidemiology (165 citations). Liu–Fang Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Malaysia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Zhiqiang Wang, Anthony E. T. Yeo, Bo Jin, Lin Wu, Hongdan Li, Huijuan Song, Rongjian Su, Jia Wei, Zhen Li and Kaichun Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, World Journal of Gastroenterology and Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.