Lisa Schwartz

800 total citations
9 papers, 183 citations indexed

About

Lisa Schwartz is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Building and Construction. According to data from OpenAlex, Lisa Schwartz has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 183 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 4 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and 2 papers in Building and Construction. Recurrent topics in Lisa Schwartz's work include Energy Efficiency and Management (4 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (3 papers) and Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (2 papers). Lisa Schwartz is often cited by papers focused on Energy Efficiency and Management (4 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (3 papers) and Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (2 papers). Lisa Schwartz collaborates with scholars based in United States. Lisa Schwartz's co-authors include Dina L. Umali, Charles Goldman, Ian M. Hoffman, Greg Leventis, Juan Pablo Carvallo, Alan H. Sanstad, Lori Bird, Kathryn M. Porter, Annika Todd and Ben Hoen and has published in prestigious journals such as Energy Policy, Energies and The Electricity Journal.

In The Last Decade

Lisa Schwartz

9 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lisa Schwartz United States	6	63	41	36	33	26	9	183
Ewa Dönitz Germany	8	28 0.4×	40 1.0×	28 0.8×	17 0.5×	48 1.8×	13	256
G. Heinrich South Africa	9	48 0.8×	19 0.5×	70 1.9×	5 0.2×	33 1.3×	19	290
Sied Hassen Ethiopia	9	15 0.2×	74 1.8×	33 0.9×	11 0.3×	59 2.3×	17	207
Gabriel Malima Tanzania	7	39 0.6×	81 2.0×	149 4.1×	4 0.1×	26 1.0×	15	295
Behjat Hojjati United States	4	36 0.6×	28 0.7×	7 0.2×	38 1.2×	49 1.9×	4	126
Mohammed Asaduzzaman Bangladesh	5	14 0.2×	19 0.5×	39 1.1×	3 0.1×	26 1.0×	13	197
Leonhard Späth Switzerland	7	11 0.2×	34 0.8×	54 1.5×	9 0.3×	25 1.0×	17	227
Balu L. Bumb United States	7	51 0.8×	9 0.2×	8 0.2×	5 0.2×	30 1.2×	19	164
André M. Nassar Brazil	8	35 0.6×	18 0.4×	10 0.3×	4 0.1×	28 1.1×	12	219
Remidius Ruhinduka Tanzania	8	65 1.0×	25 0.6×	6 0.2×	3 0.1×	34 1.3×	18	204

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Schwartz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Schwartz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Schwartz. The network helps show where Lisa Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Schwartz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Schwartz. Lisa Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Carvallo, Juan Pablo, et al.. (2022). A review of examples and opportunities to quantify the grid reliability and resilience impacts of energy efficiency. Energy Policy. 169. 113185–113185. 21 indexed citations

2.

Goldman, Charles, et al.. (2020). What does the future hold for utility electricity efficiency programs?. The Electricity Journal. 33(4). 106728–106728. 1 indexed citations

3.

Goldman, Charles, et al.. (2020). The Cost of Saving Electricity: A Multi-Program Cost Curve for Programs Funded by U.S. Utility Customers. Energies. 13(9). 2369–2369. 6 indexed citations

4.

Hoffman, Ian M., et al.. (2017). Estimating the cost of saving electricity through U.S. utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs. Energy Policy. 104. 1–12. 23 indexed citations

5.

Deason, Jeff, et al.. (2016). Residential Property Assessed Clean Energy in California: Feasibility of Studying Impacts on Mortgage Performance and Energy Savings:. 1 indexed citations

6.

Hoffman, Ian M., et al.. (2015). The Total Cost of Saving Electricity through Utility Customer-Funded Energy Efficiency Programs: Estimates at the National, State, Sector and Program Level. 19 indexed citations

7.

Hoffman, Ian M., et al.. (2015). Energy Savings Lifetimes and Persistence: Practices, Issues and Data. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 4 indexed citations

8.

Porter, Kathryn M., et al.. (2012). Meeting Renewable Energy Targets in the West at Least Cost: The Integration Challenge. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 11 indexed citations

9.

Umali, Dina L. & Lisa Schwartz. (1994). Public and private agricultural extension. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact