Lisa P. Spees
- Oncology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Stephanie B. WheelerKrista M. PerreiraCaitlin B. BiddellChristopher D. BaggettJennifer S. SmithMichael G. HudgensNoel T. BrewerXi Zhou
- Topics
- Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (33 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (22 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (17 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBlood
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaBotswana
In The Last Decade
Lisa P. Spees
82 papers receiving 608 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Oncology 238
- Epidemiology 170
- Economics and Econometrics 156
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 98
- Sociology and Political Science 66
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa P. Spees
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa P. Spees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa P. Spees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa P. Spees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa P. Spees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa P. Spees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa P. Spees. The network helps show where Lisa P. Spees may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa P. Spees
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa P. Spees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa P. Spees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa P. Spees. Lisa P. Spees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Lisa P. Spees
Lisa P. Spees is a scholar working on Family Practice, Economics and Econometrics and Oncology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (33 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (22 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (21 citations), Oncology (238 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (156 citations). Lisa P. Spees has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Botswana. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie B. Wheeler, Krista M. Perreira, Caitlin B. Biddell, Christopher D. Baggett, Jennifer S. Smith, Michael G. Hudgens, Noel T. Brewer, Xi Zhou, Erin E. Kent and Morris Weinberger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.