Lisa Christian

831 total citations
23 papers, 552 citations indexed

About

Lisa Christian is a scholar working on Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Lisa Christian has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 552 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Information Systems, 10 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 8 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Lisa Christian's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (10 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (8 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (6 papers). Lisa Christian is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (10 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (8 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (6 papers). Lisa Christian collaborates with scholars based in United States, Finland and Canada. Lisa Christian's co-authors include Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard, Joshua Borycz, Rachel Volentine, Bruce W. Grant, Robert J. Sandusky, Lynn Baird, Robert Olendorf, MacKenzie Smith and Elizabeth D. Dalton and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Documentation.

In The Last Decade

Lisa Christian

22 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lisa Christian United States 10 308 248 195 100 64 23 552
Christian Gumpenberger Austria 19 337 1.1× 160 0.6× 452 2.3× 74 0.7× 42 0.7× 42 783
Rachel Volentine United States 12 201 0.7× 151 0.6× 253 1.3× 20 0.2× 110 1.7× 22 581
Sheridan Brown United Kingdom 10 284 0.9× 169 0.7× 291 1.5× 21 0.2× 39 0.6× 14 542
Raym Crow United States 6 312 1.0× 109 0.4× 155 0.8× 15 0.1× 30 0.5× 14 535
C. Sean Burns United States 10 99 0.3× 81 0.3× 172 0.9× 27 0.3× 22 0.3× 31 402
Elizabeth D. Dalton United States 8 361 1.2× 328 1.3× 155 0.8× 178 1.8× 15 0.2× 19 583
Danny Kingsley Australia 9 120 0.4× 66 0.3× 104 0.5× 23 0.2× 46 0.7× 29 312
Susan Gibbons United Kingdom 13 412 1.3× 82 0.3× 103 0.5× 25 0.3× 70 1.1× 36 718
Geoffrey McKim United States 7 285 0.9× 101 0.4× 183 0.9× 17 0.2× 185 2.9× 10 609
Dorothea Salo United States 10 206 0.7× 93 0.4× 43 0.2× 77 0.8× 28 0.4× 31 429

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Christian

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Christian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Christian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Christian more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Christian

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Christian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Christian. The network helps show where Lisa Christian may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Christian

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Christian. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Christian based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Christian. Lisa Christian is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tenopir, Carol, Suzie Allard, Lynn Baird, et al.. (2020). Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide. PLoS ONE. 15(3). e0229003–e0229003. 161 indexed citations
2.
Tenopir, Carol, et al.. (2019). Benefits and Outcomes of Library Collections on Scholarly Reading in Finland. Libri. 69(2). 153–168. 2 indexed citations
3.
Tenopir, Carol, et al.. (2019). Seeking, Reading, and Use of Scholarly Articles: An International Study of Perceptions and Behavior of Researchers. Publications. 7(1). 18–18. 24 indexed citations
4.
Tenopir, Carol, et al.. (2019). Does Workplace Matter? How Engineers Use and Access Information Resources in Academic and Non-Academic Settings. Science & Technology Libraries. 38(3). 288–308. 5 indexed citations
5.
Tenopir, Carol, et al.. (2019). Changes in Scholarly Reading in Finland Over a Decade: Influences of E-Journals and Social Media. Libri. 69(3). 169–187. 7 indexed citations
6.
Allard, Suzie, et al.. (2018). Assisting geophysicists in data management: Perceptions and opportunities.. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2018. 1 indexed citations
7.
Tenopir, Carol, Lisa Christian, Suzie Allard, & Joshua Borycz. (2018). Research Data Sharing: Practices and Attitudes of Geophysicists. Earth and Space Science. 5(12). 891–902. 48 indexed citations
8.
Kumpulainen, Sanna, et al.. (2018). Suomalaisten tutkijoiden sosiaalisen median käyttö: sosiaalisen median merkitys työssä, tiedonhankinnassa ja tieteellisen tiedon jakamisessa. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 37(4). 1 indexed citations
9.
Tenopir, Carol, et al.. (2017). Beyond the Download: Issues in Developing a Secondary Usage Calculator. 5(2). 365–377. 2 indexed citations
10.
Tenopir, Carol, et al.. (2017). Imagining a Gold Open Access Future: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Funding Scenarios among Authors of Academic Scholarship. College & Research Libraries. 78(6). 59 indexed citations
11.
Tenopir, Carol, et al.. (2017). Survey of Scholarly Reading (Finland). 1 indexed citations
12.
13.
Tenopir, Carol, et al.. (2016). No scholar is an island: The impact of sharing in the work life of scholars. Learned Publishing. 30(1). 5–17. 15 indexed citations
14.
Tenopir, Carol, Kenneth J. Levine, Suzie Allard, et al.. (2015). Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(10). 2344–2361. 54 indexed citations
15.
Tenopir, Carol, Suzie Allard, & Lisa Christian. (2015). Beyond Downloads: Digital Usage of Scholarly Articles Survey Instrument. 2 indexed citations
16.
Tenopir, Carol, Donald W. King, Lisa Christian, & Rachel Volentine. (2015). Scholarly article seeking, reading, and use: a continuing evolution from print to electronic in the sciences and social sciences. Learned Publishing. 28(2). 93–105. 46 indexed citations
17.
Tenopir, Carol, et al.. (2015). To Boldly Go Beyond Downloads: How Are Journal Articles Shared and Used?. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 123–127. 7 indexed citations
18.
Jamali, Hamid R., David Nicholas, Anthony Watkinson, et al.. (2014). How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences. Library & Information Science Research. 36(3-4). 192–202. 44 indexed citations
19.
Tenopir, Carol, Rachel Volentine, & Lisa Christian. (2014). Scholarly Reading by Academic Staff: Summary Results of a Study Conducted in 2012 at Two Universities in Australia. 3 indexed citations
20.
Tenopir, Carol, Rachel Volentine, & Lisa Christian. (2014). Scholarly Reading by Graduate Students in the United States: Summary Results of a Study Conducted in 2012 in Four Universities. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026