Ling‐Ling Yang
Impact in
- Microbiology top 2%
- Biotechnology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 46
- Pharmacology 18
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 17
- Co-authors
- Wen‐Jun Li (30 shared papers)Xiao‐Yang Zhi (23 shared papers)Shu‐Kun Tang (21 shared papers)Han Zhou (2 shared papers)Di ZHANG (2 shared papers)Tongxiang Fan (2 shared papers)Xiaomei Yan (3 shared papers)Lina Wu (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY (23 papers)Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (9 papers)Analytical Chemistry (5 papers)Archives of Microbiology (4 papers)Current Microbiology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaTaiwanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ling‐Ling Yang
101 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Microbiology 39
- Biotechnology 127
- Molecular Biology 802
- Ecology 280
- Pharmacology 170
Countries citing papers authored by Ling‐Ling Yang
This map shows the geographic impact of Ling‐Ling Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling‐Ling Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling‐Ling Yang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ling‐Ling Yang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling‐Ling Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling‐Ling Yang. The network helps show where Ling‐Ling Yang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling‐Ling Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 116 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 72 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 44 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 43 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 17 | The availability of 16S rRNA for the identification of forensically important flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in China. | 2010 | 26 |
| 18 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 24 |
About Ling‐Ling Yang
Ling‐Ling Yang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Cell Biology, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 104 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (46 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (17 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (14 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (13 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (7 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (7 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (7 papers) and TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (39 citations), Biotechnology (127 citations), Molecular Biology (802 citations), Ecology (280 citations) and Pharmacology (170 citations). Ling‐Ling Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wen‐Jun Li, Xiao‐Yang Zhi, Shu‐Kun Tang, Han Zhou, Di ZHANG, Tongxiang Fan, Xiaomei Yan, Lina Wu, Shaobin Zhu and Lih-Geeng Chen. Their work appears in journals such as INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Analytical Chemistry, Archives of Microbiology and Current Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.