Linda Williams

754 total citations
34 papers, 555 citations indexed

About

Linda Williams is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Medical Laboratory Technology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Linda Williams has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 555 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 8 papers in Medical Laboratory Technology and 6 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Linda Williams's work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (12 papers), Quality and Safety in Healthcare (8 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers). Linda Williams is often cited by papers focused on Patient Safety and Medication Errors (12 papers), Quality and Safety in Healthcare (8 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers). Linda Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Linda Williams's co-authors include James P. Bagian, Scott D. McKnight, John Gosbee, Judith Anderson, Mary Bessesen, Charlotte Clarke, Ailsa Cook, Catherine E. Gibb, John Keady and Heather Wilkinson and has published in prestigious journals such as Critical Care Medicine, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and JAMA Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Linda Williams

30 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Linda Williams United States 11 194 136 120 64 61 34 555
Fernanda Raphael Escobar Gimenes Brazil 14 248 1.3× 96 0.7× 127 1.1× 38 0.6× 61 1.0× 91 609
Zenewton André da Silva Gama Brazil 12 220 1.1× 147 1.1× 200 1.7× 35 0.5× 71 1.2× 57 595
David C. Stockwell United States 19 352 1.8× 141 1.0× 158 1.3× 118 1.8× 101 1.7× 51 880
Mary L Grady 4 205 1.1× 151 1.1× 78 0.7× 31 0.5× 81 1.3× 5 528
Sarah Scobie United Kingdom 13 244 1.3× 169 1.2× 167 1.4× 23 0.4× 120 2.0× 22 690
Maria Unbeck Sweden 15 372 1.9× 117 0.9× 162 1.4× 32 0.5× 51 0.8× 45 657
Marco Di Muzio Italy 17 239 1.2× 237 1.7× 58 0.5× 22 0.3× 46 0.8× 96 852
Rhanna Emanuela Fontenele Lima de Carvalho Brazil 16 397 2.0× 174 1.3× 288 2.4× 60 0.9× 65 1.1× 101 909
Janete de Souza Urbanetto Brazil 15 145 0.7× 263 1.9× 43 0.4× 20 0.3× 78 1.3× 69 636
Mohammad Suliman Jordan 15 118 0.6× 142 1.0× 38 0.3× 30 0.5× 33 0.5× 70 560

Countries citing papers authored by Linda Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Williams. The network helps show where Linda Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Williams. Linda Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Williams, Linda, et al.. (2024). ‘It's not a solution to keep telling me to lose weight!’ Exploring endometrial cancer survivors’ experiences of nutrition and well‐being advice: A qualitative study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 65(1). 156–162.
3.
Choi, Jae-Won, et al.. (2024). Natural language processing in the intensive care unit: A scoping review. Critical Care and Resuscitation. 26(3). 210–216. 2 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Linda, Claire Henry, Bryony Simcock, & Sara Filoche. (2023). Increasing incidence of endometrial cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: Health professionals' perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 64(2). 114–119. 1 indexed citations
5.
Marshall, Andrea P., Diane Chamberlain, Lee‐anne S. Chapple, et al.. (2020). A critical care pandemic staffing framework in Australia. Australian Critical Care. 34(2). 123–131. 26 indexed citations
6.
Simning, Adam, et al.. (2020). Addressing Skilled Nursing Facilities' COVID-19 Psychosocial Needs Via Staff Training and a Process Group Intervention. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 28(8). 894–895. 8 indexed citations
7.
Kelly, Sean G., et al.. (2020). Guiding principles to optimise intensive care capacity. Australian Critical Care. 33. S35–S35. 1 indexed citations
8.
Nyström, Daniel, Linda Williams, Douglas E. Paull, Mark L. Graber, & Robin R. Hemphill. (2016). A Theory-Integrated Model of Medical Diagnosis. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 10(1). 14–35. 4 indexed citations
9.
Paull, Douglas E., et al.. (2015). The Human Factors of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Modeling Insulin Pump Use Issues. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care. 4(1). 124–128. 1 indexed citations
10.
Nyström, Daniel, Linda Williams, Douglas E. Paull, & Mark L. Graber. (2014). Work Domain Analysis Applied to Medical Diagnosis. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care. 3(1). 157–161. 3 indexed citations
11.
Watts, Bradley V., Linda Williams, Peter D. Mills, et al.. (2013). Curriculum Development and Implementation of a National Interprofessional Fellowship in Patient Safety. Journal of Patient Safety. 14(3). 127–132. 4 indexed citations
12.
Paull, Douglas E. & Linda Williams. (2013). Improving Patient Safety through Educational Initiatives. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 57(1). 1527–1530. 1 indexed citations
13.
Williams, Linda, et al.. (2012). Emergency Exercise Participation and Evaluation. Journal of Extension. 50(3). 4 indexed citations
14.
Anderson, Judith, et al.. (2010). Using human factors engineering to improve the effectiveness of infection prevention and control. Critical Care Medicine. 38(8 Suppl). S269–S281. 55 indexed citations
15.
Clarke, Charlotte, John Keady, Heather Wilkinson, et al.. (2010). Dementia and risk: contested territories of everyday life. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 2(2). 102–112. 35 indexed citations
16.
Clarke, Charlotte, Catherine E. Gibb, John Keady, et al.. (2009). Risk management dilemmas in dementia care: an organizational survey in three UK countries. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 4(2). 89–96. 19 indexed citations
17.
Williams, Linda. (2005). Changing systems the hands-on way. The VA National Center for Patient Safety's Museum.. PubMed. 6(4). 16–8. 8 indexed citations
18.
Morison, Sara J., Liisa Holsti, Ruth E. Grunau, et al.. (2003). Are there developmentally distinct motor indicators of pain in preterm infants?. Early Human Development. 72(2). 131–146. 58 indexed citations
19.
Bagian, James P., et al.. (2002). The Veterans Affairs Root Cause Analysis System in Action. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 28(10). 531–545. 180 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Linda, et al.. (2001). Evaluating the use of anaudit tool to identify health promotion activities in practice. Nurse Education in Practice. 1(4). 196–203. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026