Linda van Bommel

694 citations
13 papers · 426 indexed · h-index 8
Topics
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers)Human-Animal Interaction Studies (8 papers)Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers)
Journals
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEBiological Conservation

In The Last Decade

Linda van Bommel

13 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Linda van Bommel
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Ecology 262
  • Global and Planetary Change 184
  • Genetics 138
  • Small Animals 89
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 81
Replace Mriganka Shekhar Sarkar with:
Mriganka Shekhar Sarkar India
Jack Wierzchowski Canada
Thakur Silwal Nepal
Mathieu Bourbonnais Canada
Roy V. Rea Canada
Claude Dussault Canada
Lorraine K. Boast South Africa
Sarah B. Bassing United States
Nigel Waltho Canada
Phillipa C. McCormack Australia
Linda van Bommel relative to Mriganka Shekhar Sarkar India Mriganka Shekhar Sarkar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Mriganka Shekhar Sarkar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Linda van Bommel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda van Bommel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda van Bommel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda van Bommel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda van Bommel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda van Bommel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda van Bommel. The network helps show where Linda van Bommel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda van Bommel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda van Bommel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda van Bommel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda van Bommel. Linda van Bommel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 2
3 8
4
LIVESTOCK GUARDING DOGS TODAY: POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS TO PERCEIVED LIMITATIONS
5
5 12
6 20
7 23
8 41
9 2
10 188
11 82
12 3
13 38

About Linda van Bommel

Linda van Bommel is a scholar working on Small Animals, Ecology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 13 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (8 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (89 citations), Ecology (262 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (184 citations). Linda van Bommel has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher N. Johnson, David B. Lindenmayer, A. Malcolm Gill, Ross A. Bradstock, Emma Knight, Max A. Moritz, Scott L. Stephens, Geoffrey J. Cary, Philip Gibbons and Don A. Driscoll. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Biological Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026