Linda O. Eckert
- Epidemiology top 1%
- Microbiology top 0.5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 2%
- Health top 1%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Naomi F. SugarDavid FineStephen E. HawesBjörn WulltManisha Juthani‐MehtaShandra L. KnightLindsay E. NicolleRichard Colgan
- Topics
- Reproductive tract infections research (19 papers)Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (17 papers)Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Linda O. Eckert
81 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Epidemiology 1.6k
- Microbiology 656
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 544
- Health 520
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 413
Countries citing papers authored by Linda O. Eckert
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda O. Eckert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda O. Eckert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda O. Eckert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda O. Eckert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda O. Eckert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda O. Eckert. The network helps show where Linda O. Eckert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda O. Eckert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda O. Eckert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda O. Eckert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda O. Eckert. Linda O. Eckert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: 2019 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of Americabreakdown → | 284 |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 70 | |
| 14 | 86 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 156 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Linda O. Eckert
Linda O. Eckert is a scholar working on Microbiology, Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive tract infections research (19 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (17 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (656 citations), Health (520 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (123 citations). Linda O. Eckert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Naomi F. Sugar, David Fine, Stephen E. Hawes, Björn Wullt, Manisha Juthani‐Mehta, Shandra L. Knight, Lindsay E. Nicolle, Richard Colgan, Reed Siemieniuk and Kalpana Gupta. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.