This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Best more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Best. The network helps show where Linda Best may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Best
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Best.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Best based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Best. Linda Best is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Best, Linda & Daniel J. Shelley. (2018). Academic Dishonesty. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 14(3). 1–14.12 indexed citations
Best, Linda, et al.. (2006). The Impact of Popular Culture on Communication Skills: A Commentary with Insights for Writing Instruction. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 22(2). 63.2 indexed citations
4.
Sutton, M. R., et al.. (2005). Practical Insights on the Pedagogy of Group Work. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 22(1). 71.4 indexed citations
5.
Best, Linda. (2005). Class Size and the Goals of the Writing Course: Exploring Classroom Management Strategies. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 21(2). 73.1 indexed citations
6.
Best, Linda. (2005). Crossing the Boundaries: A Case Study of One Remedial Student's Transformation into a College Writer. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 22(1). 27.1 indexed citations
7.
Best, Linda, et al.. (2004). View from the Bridge: Connecting At-Level, Developmental, and ESL Writers. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 20(2). 5.1 indexed citations
8.
Best, Linda, et al.. (2004). HELICOBACTER PYLORI ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN CANADIAN POPULATIONS. 126. 0–0.12 indexed citations
9.
Best, Linda. (2002). Comparison of the perceptions of university faculty and pre-service students' technology skills and integration of technology in selected elementary education courses. 1–380.2 indexed citations
10.
Best, Linda, et al.. (2001). A Report on Student Achievement in a Pilot Program for Developmental Students.. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 18(1). 15–23.3 indexed citations
11.
Best, Linda, et al.. (2000). A Vision for Skill Development: The New General Education Program at Kean University.. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 16(2). 119–122.1 indexed citations
Best, Linda. (1998). Planning and Implementing the Multimedia Networked ESL Laboratory Classroom. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 14(2). 75–86.1 indexed citations
17.
Best, Linda. (1996). The Nature of Developmental Writing: A Cognitive Explanation with Practical Implications.. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 13(1). 5–18.1 indexed citations
Best, Linda, et al.. (1994). Tying it all together: integrating a hospital-based health care system through case management education.. PubMed. 3(2). 69–73, 87.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.