Limy Wong

62 total papers · 578 total citations
30 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

Limy Wong is a scholar working on Nephrology, Physiology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Limy Wong has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Nephrology, 9 papers in Physiology and 7 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Limy Wong's work include Nutrition and Health in Aging (6 papers), Vasculitis and related conditions (5 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (4 papers). Limy Wong is often cited by papers focused on Nutrition and Health in Aging (6 papers), Vasculitis and related conditions (5 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (4 papers). Limy Wong collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, Australia and United Kingdom. Limy Wong's co-authors include Peter J. Conlon, Lawrence P. McMahon, Anthony Dorman, John O’Regan, Patrick O’Kelly, H. Terence Cook, Tom Cairns, Mary Waldron, Gustavo Duque and Nicholas Medjeral‐Thomas and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Limy Wong

27 papers receiving 358 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Limy Wong	219	162	76	62	48	30	366
Valentina Gracchi	164 0.7×	164 1.0×	38 0.5×	57 0.9×	23 0.5×	26	391
Bogdan Obrișcă	201 0.9×	72 0.4×	54 0.7×	67 1.1×	22 0.5×	51	396
S Colon	236 1.1×	42 0.3×	94 1.2×	72 1.2×	29 0.6×	27	352
Glassock Rj	181 0.8×	66 0.4×	61 0.8×	61 1.0×	19 0.4×	22	337
Xu Zeng	129 0.6×	64 0.4×	62 0.8×	59 1.0×	16 0.3×	28	349
Bogdan Sorohan	168 0.8×	77 0.5×	45 0.6×	51 0.8×	9 0.2×	45	341
Yoshitsugu Kaku	256 1.2×	51 0.3×	93 1.2×	52 0.8×	23 0.5×	23	339
Hiroya Hasegawa	144 0.7×	98 0.6×	117 1.5×	65 1.0×	14 0.3×	30	374
R Habib	198 0.9×	69 0.4×	49 0.6×	66 1.1×	19 0.4×	27	312
Hiroko Chikamoto	222 1.0×	41 0.3×	41 0.5×	64 1.0×	13 0.3×	30	379

Countries citing papers authored by Limy Wong

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Limy Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Limy Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Limy Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Limy Wong

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Limy Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Limy Wong. The network helps show where Limy Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Limy Wong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Limy Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Limy Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Limy Wong. Limy Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact