Lily Kirk

570 total citations
10 papers, 234 citations indexed

About

Lily Kirk is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Water Science and Technology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Lily Kirk has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 234 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 5 papers in Water Science and Technology and 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Lily Kirk's work include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (6 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (5 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers). Lily Kirk is often cited by papers focused on Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (6 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (5 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers). Lily Kirk collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and Germany. Lily Kirk's co-authors include Matthew J. Cohen, James B. Heffernan, Philip Savoy, Robert T. Hensley, Emily S. Bernhardt, Ashley M. Helton, Nancy B. Grimm, Robert O. Hall, Maite Arroita and William H. McDowell and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Limnology and Oceanography and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Lily Kirk

9 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lily Kirk United States 7 135 99 93 90 61 10 234
Erwin E. Van Nieuwenhuyse United States 9 154 1.1× 203 2.1× 175 1.9× 120 1.3× 66 1.1× 17 358
Andreas Schöl Germany 10 102 0.8× 146 1.5× 150 1.6× 69 0.8× 113 1.9× 18 300
Claire M. Ruffing United States 8 127 0.9× 65 0.7× 169 1.8× 89 1.0× 23 0.4× 15 260
Mike Hughes Spain 6 75 0.6× 63 0.6× 77 0.8× 96 1.1× 21 0.3× 9 211
Aline Jaimes United States 4 74 0.5× 108 1.1× 70 0.8× 62 0.7× 76 1.2× 7 274
Emily R. Nodine United States 6 71 0.5× 137 1.4× 71 0.8× 67 0.7× 107 1.8× 7 229
J. A. Edmundson United States 7 146 1.1× 143 1.4× 119 1.3× 51 0.6× 137 2.2× 9 332
Curtis L. DeGasperi United States 6 63 0.5× 91 0.9× 69 0.7× 79 0.9× 60 1.0× 12 207
Caren E. Scott United States 7 49 0.4× 57 0.6× 49 0.5× 54 0.6× 33 0.5× 7 142
Valerie Carolin Wentzky Germany 6 43 0.3× 122 1.2× 82 0.9× 64 0.7× 114 1.9× 6 250

Countries citing papers authored by Lily Kirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lily Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lily Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lily Kirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lily Kirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lily Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lily Kirk. The network helps show where Lily Kirk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lily Kirk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lily Kirk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lily Kirk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lily Kirk. Lily Kirk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
2.
Kirk, Lily, Jana E. Compton, Anne Neale, Robert D. Sabo, & Jay R. Christensen. (2023). Our national nutrient reduction needs: Applying a conservation prioritization framework to US agricultural lands. Journal of Environmental Management. 351. 119758–119758. 10 indexed citations
3.
Kirk, Lily & Matthew J. Cohen. (2023). River Corridor Sources Dominate CO2 Emissions From a Lowland River Network. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences. 128(1). 9 indexed citations
4.
Bernhardt, Emily S., Philip Savoy, Alison Appling, et al.. (2022). Light and flow regimes regulate the metabolism of rivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(8). 119 indexed citations
5.
Bernal, Susana, Matthew J. Cohen, José L. J. Ledesma, et al.. (2022). Stream metabolism sources a large fraction of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere in two hydrologically contrasting headwater streams. Limnology and Oceanography. 67(12). 2621–2634. 28 indexed citations
6.
Savoy, Philip, Emily S. Bernhardt, Lily Kirk, Matthew J. Cohen, & James B. Heffernan. (2021). A seasonally dynamic model of light at the stream surface. Freshwater Science. 40(2). 286–301. 14 indexed citations
7.
Kirk, Lily, Robert T. Hensley, Philip Savoy, James B. Heffernan, & Matthew J. Cohen. (2020). Estimating Benthic Light Regimes Improves Predictions of Primary Production and constrains Light-Use Efficiency in Streams and Rivers. Ecosystems. 24(4). 825–839. 27 indexed citations
8.
Hensley, Robert T., et al.. (2019). Flow Extremes as Spatiotemporal Control Points on River Solute Fluxes and Metabolism. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences. 124(3). 537–555. 21 indexed citations
9.
Kirk, Lily, et al.. (2003). Subsidence Wetlands: An Assessment of Values. Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation. 2003(1). 882–901. 2 indexed citations
10.
Kirk, Lily, et al.. (1987). Identification of ninhydrin-positive caprolactam metabolites in the rat. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 25(3). 233–239. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026