Countries citing papers authored by Lieselotte Brems
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lieselotte Brems's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lieselotte Brems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lieselotte Brems more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lieselotte Brems
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lieselotte Brems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lieselotte Brems. The network helps show where Lieselotte Brems may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lieselotte Brems
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lieselotte Brems.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lieselotte Brems based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lieselotte Brems. Lieselotte Brems is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brems, Lieselotte & An Van linden. (2019). Miracles and mirativity: Lexical versus grammatical uses of wonder, marvel, and surprise. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).
3.
linden, An Van & Lieselotte Brems. (2018). It was chance’s chance to become polyfunctional in the modal domain. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).
4.
Brems, Lieselotte & An Van linden. (2018). No way and no chance as emphatic negative response items. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).2 indexed citations
linden, An Van & Lieselotte Brems. (2017). Talmy’s “greater modal system”: fitting in verbo-nominal constructions with chance(s). Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
7.
Davidse, Kristin, et al.. (2016). Mirativity and rhetorical structure. 125–156.1 indexed citations
linden, An Van, Kristin Davidse, & Lieselotte Brems. (2014). Negative polarity as a trigger for the development of modal meaning. Lirias (KU Leuven).
10.
Brems, Lieselotte, Lobke Ghesquière, & Freek Van de Velde. (2014). Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in grammar and discourse.3 indexed citations
Davidse, Kristin, et al.. (2013). A comparative study of the grammaticalized uses of English sort of and French genre de in teenage forum data. Lirias (KU Leuven).7 indexed citations
13.
Brems, Lieselotte, et al.. (2012). The development of mirative no wonder-constructions. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).2 indexed citations
14.
Breban, Tine, et al.. (2012). New reflections on the sources, outcomes, defining features and motivations of grammaticalization. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).
15.
Breban, Tine, et al.. (2012). Introduction: New reflections on the sources, outcomes, defining features and motivations of grammaticalization. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège). 1–34.2 indexed citations
Brems, Lieselotte. (2007). The synchronic layering of English size and Type noun constructions. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).5 indexed citations
19.
Brems, Lieselotte. (2004). Type noun constructions. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
20.
Brems, Lieselotte & Kristin Davidse. (2003). Absolute and relative quantification : beyond mutually exclusive word classes.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.