Lies Boelen

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Lies Boelen is a scholar working on Immunology, Molecular Biology and Biophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Lies Boelen has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Immunology, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Biophysics. Recurrent topics in Lies Boelen's work include T-cell and B-cell Immunology (6 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (4 papers) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers). Lies Boelen is often cited by papers focused on T-cell and B-cell Immunology (6 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (4 papers) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers). Lies Boelen collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Lies Boelen's co-authors include Becca Asquith, Derek C. Macallan, Richard A. Flavell, Anthony Rongvaux, James N. Fullerton, Alexander A. Maini, Venetia Bigley, Derek W. Gilroy, Amit A. Patel and Simon Yona and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and Bioinformatics.

In The Last Decade

Lies Boelen

20 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

The fate and lifespan of human monocyte subsets in steady... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 200 400 600

Peers

Lies Boelen
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Immunology 583
  • Molecular Biology 235
  • Epidemiology 158
  • Oncology 132
  • Infectious Diseases 84
Replace Bryan. Carson with:
Bryan. Carson United States
Marlys S. Fassett United States
Wei Hseun Yeap Singapore
Steven Schaffert United States
Liat Stoler‐Barak Israel
Paola Marcovecchio United States
Andrew G. Levine United States
Jakob Theorell Sweden
Brahma V. Kumar United States
Carole L. Galligan Canada
Bryan. Carson United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Lies Boelen
Lies Boelen · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Lies Boelen
Lies Boelen · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Lies Boelen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lies Boelen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lies Boelen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lies Boelen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lies Boelen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lies Boelen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lies Boelen. The network helps show where Lies Boelen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lies Boelen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lies Boelen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lies Boelen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lies Boelen. Lies Boelen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 8
2 28
3 7
4 18
5 18
6 56
7 21
8 8
9
The fate and lifespan of human monocyte subsets in steady state and systemic inflammation breakdown →
639
10 4
11 58
12 38
13 13
14 37
15 24
16 16
17 29
18 22
19 1
20 8

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026