Libor Šnobl

447 citations
32 papers · 239 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Libor Šnobl

29 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Libor Šnobl
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Algebra and Number Theory 94
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 166
  • Geometry and Topology 105
  • Mathematical Physics 46
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 13
Replace Kouichi Takemura with:
Kouichi Takemura Japan
Wolfgang Eholzer Germany
Karen Yeats Canada
Nils Carqueville Germany
Alexander Stolin Sweden
Misha Feigin United Kingdom
Hans-Werner Wiesbrock Germany
Bianca L. Cerchiai Italy
J C Pérez Bueno Spain
Hendryk Pfeiffer Canada
Libor Šnobl relative to Kouichi Takemura Japan Kouichi Takemura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Kouichi Takemura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Libor Šnobl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Libor Šnobl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Libor Šnobl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Libor Šnobl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Libor Šnobl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Libor Šnobl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Libor Šnobl. The network helps show where Libor Šnobl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Libor Šnobl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Libor Šnobl Line = papers co-authored together Libor Šnobl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201468
2 200218
3 201715
4 200914
5 201814
6 200912
7 201811
8 201910
9 199910
10 20209
11 20159
12 20226
13 20235
14 20215
15 20085
16 20114
17 20013
18 20003
19 20073
20 20232

About Libor Šnobl

Libor Šnobl is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Geometry and Topology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (23 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (12 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (11 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (7 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (7 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (6 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (5 papers) and Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (94 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (166 citations), Geometry and Topology (105 citations), Mathematical Physics (46 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (13 citations). Libor Šnobl has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. Winternitz, Ladislav Hlavatý, A. M. Grundland, Sarah Post, Frédérik Fournier, Md Fazlul Hoque, Martin Schnabl and Č. Burdík. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, Journal of Geometry and Physics, Journal of High Energy Physics, Nuclear Physics B and International Journal of Modern Physics A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact