Libor Fila
Impact in
-
- Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Papers in
-
- Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances 22
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research 5
- Surgery 7
- Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes 5
- Co-authors
- Pavel Dřevı́nek (8 shared papers)Milan Maçek (7 shared papers)Oto Melter (3 shared papers)Václav Čapek (2 shared papers)Karel Fišer (1 shared paper)T. Piskáčková (2 shared papers)Béla Nagy (2 shared papers)János Kappelmayer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Cystic Fibrosis (7 papers)CHEST Journal (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1 paper)BMC Pulmonary Medicine (1 paper)Transplant Immunology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaBelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Libor Fila
34 papers receiving 269 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 135
- Endocrinology 22
- Molecular Medicine 21
- Microbiology 8
- Plant Science 46
Countries citing papers authored by Libor Fila
This map shows the geographic impact of Libor Fila's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Libor Fila with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Libor Fila more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Libor Fila
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Libor Fila. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Libor Fila. The network helps show where Libor Fila may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Libor Fila, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 19 | [Twenty years of care for cystic fibrosis adults in Czech Republic]. | 2009 | 2 |
| 20 | 2017 | 2 |
About Libor Fila
Libor Fila is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (22 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (5 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (2 papers) and Respiratory viral infections research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (135 citations), Endocrinology (22 citations), Molecular Medicine (21 citations), Microbiology (8 citations) and Plant Science (46 citations). Libor Fila has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pavel Dřevı́nek, Milan Maçek, Oto Melter, Václav Čapek, Karel Fišer, T. Piskáčková, Béla Nagy, János Kappelmayer, Emmanuelle Masson and Claude Férec. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, CHEST Journal, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, BMC Pulmonary Medicine and Transplant Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.