Liat Gantz

478 total citations
29 papers, 181 citations indexed

About

Liat Gantz is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Liat Gantz has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 181 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Ophthalmology, 11 papers in Epidemiology and 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Liat Gantz's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (11 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (9 papers). Liat Gantz is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (11 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (9 papers). Liat Gantz collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and Spain. Liat Gantz's co-authors include Harold E. Bedell, Einat Shneor, Lluïsa Quevedo i Junyent, Saumil S. Patel, Hadas Stiebel‐Kalish, Susana T. L. Chung, Ronald S. Harwerth, Ariela Gordon‐Shaag, David P. Piñero and Avi Caspi and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Liat Gantz

25 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Liat Gantz Israel	9	75	73	69	56	38	29	181
Mhairi Day United Kingdom	10	156 2.1×	85 1.2×	158 2.3×	97 1.7×	47 1.2×	20	313
Abinaya Priya Venkataraman Sweden	10	130 1.7×	133 1.8×	76 1.1×	129 2.3×	22 0.6×	37	249
Endri Angjeli United States	8	94 1.3×	129 1.8×	80 1.2×	57 1.0×	130 3.4×	20	299
Gordon Heron United Kingdom	11	236 3.1×	163 2.2×	174 2.5×	131 2.3×	34 0.9×	19	370
Editha Ong United States	9	184 2.5×	112 1.5×	123 1.8×	104 1.9×	20 0.5×	11	287
Linda Colpa Canada	12	242 3.2×	144 2.0×	245 3.6×	57 1.0×	13 0.3×	18	400
C. Nakatsuka Japan	8	288 3.8×	156 2.1×	105 1.5×	227 4.1×	55 1.4×	10	368
Takahiro Niida Japan	9	202 2.7×	200 2.7×	117 1.7×	135 2.4×	23 0.6×	33	322
Ali Mirzajani Iran	11	118 1.6×	163 2.2×	66 1.0×	159 2.8×	68 1.8×	68	321
Ronald Rabbetts United Kingdom	7	282 3.8×	227 3.1×	90 1.3×	255 4.6×	51 1.3×	12	443

Countries citing papers authored by Liat Gantz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liat Gantz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liat Gantz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liat Gantz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liat Gantz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liat Gantz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liat Gantz. The network helps show where Liat Gantz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liat Gantz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liat Gantz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liat Gantz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liat Gantz. Liat Gantz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gantz, Liat, et al.. (2025). Reproducibility and within‐subject variability of HRK‐9000A meibography in normal young participants. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 45(2). 416–422. 1 indexed citations

Bitton, Etty, et al.. (2025). Prevalence of Demodex folliculorum in a university-based population. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 109(2). 187–194.

Gantz, Liat, Einat Shneor, N. Shaw, & Ravid Doron. (2024). The Effect of Prism Presentation Order on Near Vertical Fusional Vergence Ranges of Normal Young Adults. Clinical ophthalmology. Volume 18. 3473–3484.

Gispets, Joan, et al.. (2024). Assessment of a Clinical Test for Detection of Alteration in Visual Perception Due to Astigmatism. Clinical ophthalmology. Volume 18. 723–733. 1 indexed citations

Gantz, Liat, et al.. (2024). Complications and compliance in professionally-managed and self-managed contact lenses compared with non-contact lens wearers. PLoS ONE. 19(9). e0308538–e0308538.

Junyent, Lluïsa Quevedo i, et al.. (2023). Contact lens wear and follow‐up and its association with signs and symptoms of meibomian gland dysfunction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 44(1). 153–167. 8 indexed citations

Junyent, Lluïsa Quevedo i, et al.. (2022). Topical review of the relationship between contact lens wear and meibomian gland dysfunction. Journal of Optometry. 16(1). 12–19. 10 indexed citations

Gantz, Liat, et al.. (2022). Validation of the DYOP visual acuity test. Journal of Optometry. 16(4). 268–276. 2 indexed citations

Gantz, Liat & Mark Rosenfield. (2021). Digital eye strain symptoms during online university learning in Israel and the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 62(8). 1975–1975. 2 indexed citations

10.

Gantz, Liat & Hadas Stiebel‐Kalish. (2021). Convergence insufficiency: Review of clinical diagnostic signs. Journal of Optometry. 15(4). 256–270. 12 indexed citations

11.

Gantz, Liat, Einat Shneor, & Ravid Doron. (2021). Agreement and inter-session repeatability of manual and automatic interpupillary distance measurements. Journal of Optometry. 14(4). 299–314. 8 indexed citations

12.

Gantz, Liat, et al.. (2019). Reading speed of patients with infantile nystagmus for text in different orientations. Vision Research. 155. 17–23. 3 indexed citations

13.

Stiebel‐Kalish, Hadas, et al.. (2018). The Discrepancy between Subjective and Objective Measures of Convergence Insufficiency in Whiplash-Associated Disorder versus Control Participants. Ophthalmology. 125(6). 924–928. 5 indexed citations

14.

Gordon‐Shaag, Ariela, et al.. (2018). Validation of refraction and anterior segment parameters by a new multi-diagnostic platform (VX120). Journal of Optometry. 11(4). 242–251. 21 indexed citations

15.

Gantz, Liat, et al.. (2015). Can the Red-Green Duochrome Test Be Used Prior to Correcting the Refractive Cylinder Component?. PLoS ONE. 10(3). e0118874–e0118874. 9 indexed citations

16.

Shneor, Einat, et al.. (2015). A survey of the criteria for prescribing in cases of borderline refractive errors. Journal of Optometry. 9(1). 22–31. 8 indexed citations

17.

Bedell, Harold E., et al.. (2012). Perceived Suprathreshold Depth Under Conditions that Elevate the Stereothreshold. Optometry and Vision Science. 89(12). 1768–1773. 2 indexed citations

18.

Gantz, Liat & Harold E. Bedell. (2011). Variation of Stereothreshold with Random-Dot Stereogram Density. Optometry and Vision Science. 88(9). 1066–1071. 11 indexed citations

19.

Gantz, Liat & Harold E. Bedell. (2008). Variation of Stereothreshold With Random-Dot Density. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 2545–2545. 2 indexed citations

20.

Gantz, Liat, Saumil S. Patel, Susana T. L. Chung, & Ronald S. Harwerth. (2007). Mechanisms of perceptual learning of depth discrimination in random dot stereograms. Vision Research. 47(16). 2170–2178. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact