Leo R. Douglas

633 total citations
11 papers, 268 citations indexed

About

Leo R. Douglas is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Leo R. Douglas has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 268 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Ecology, 2 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Leo R. Douglas's work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers). Leo R. Douglas is often cited by papers focused on Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers). Leo R. Douglas collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Leo R. Douglas's co-authors include Diogo Veríssimo, Meredith Root‐Bernstein, Gary Winkel, Norberto Casillas, Maher A. Alodan, Thomas W. Sherry, William H. Smyrl, Miguel Menezes de Sequeira, José Jesus and Holly P. Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Materials Science and Engineering A, Biological Conservation and Biodiversity and Conservation.

In The Last Decade

Leo R. Douglas

10 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Leo R. Douglas United States 7 109 100 41 40 34 11 268
Siân Waters United Kingdom 11 178 1.6× 141 1.4× 58 1.4× 23 0.6× 18 0.5× 22 266
Amanda D. Webber United Kingdom 7 162 1.5× 207 2.1× 41 1.0× 68 1.7× 31 0.9× 15 351
Amelia Meier United States 9 129 1.2× 188 1.9× 20 0.5× 27 0.7× 28 0.8× 17 285
Clark E. Adams United States 9 49 0.4× 143 1.4× 61 1.5× 37 0.9× 21 0.6× 29 276
Maria Petridou Greece 11 47 0.4× 84 0.8× 35 0.9× 17 0.4× 19 0.6× 34 340
M. C. Baker United States 6 105 1.0× 282 2.8× 69 1.7× 32 0.8× 108 3.2× 7 373
Sara Dubois Canada 8 123 1.1× 258 2.6× 149 3.6× 35 0.9× 32 0.9× 11 384
Shari L. Rodriguez United States 8 58 0.5× 154 1.5× 77 1.9× 67 1.7× 20 0.6× 21 325
Arnold F. Sitompul United States 6 267 2.4× 184 1.8× 59 1.4× 30 0.8× 19 0.6× 9 396
Hirokazu Yasuoka Japan 11 45 0.4× 143 1.4× 16 0.4× 73 1.8× 25 0.7× 18 295

Countries citing papers authored by Leo R. Douglas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo R. Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo R. Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo R. Douglas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo R. Douglas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo R. Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo R. Douglas. The network helps show where Leo R. Douglas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leo R. Douglas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leo R. Douglas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leo R. Douglas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leo R. Douglas. Leo R. Douglas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Olsson, Erik J, A. Justin Nowakowski, Jonathan Drescher‐Lehman, et al.. (2025). Afro-descendant lands in South America contribute to biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation. Communications Earth & Environment. 6(1).
2.
Rocha, Ricardo, Miguel Menezes de Sequeira, Leo R. Douglas, et al.. (2017). Extinctions of introduced game species on oceanic islands: curse for hunters or conservation opportunities?. Biodiversity and Conservation. 26(10). 2517–2520. 10 indexed citations
3.
Douglas, Leo R., et al.. (2014). High-value natural resources: Linking wildlife conservation to international conflict, insecurity, and development concerns. Biological Conservation. 171. 270–277. 60 indexed citations
4.
Douglas, Leo R. & Gary Winkel. (2014). The flipside of the flagship. Biodiversity and Conservation. 23(4). 979–997. 22 indexed citations
6.
Douglas, Leo R., Gary Winkel, & Thomas W. Sherry. (2013). Does the Bananaquit Benefit Commensally from Parrot Frugivory? An Assessment Using Habitat Quality. Biotropica. 45(4). 457–464. 9 indexed citations
7.
Root‐Bernstein, Meredith, et al.. (2013). Anthropomorphized species as tools for conservation: utility beyond prosocial, intelligent and suffering species. Biodiversity and Conservation. 22(8). 1577–1589. 85 indexed citations
8.
Douglas, Leo R.. (2012). The Cutty Sark is back [ship revival]. Engineering & Technology. 7(9). 68–71. 1 indexed citations
9.
Douglas, Leo R.. (2011). Social and Ecological Underpinnings of Human Wildlife Conflict on Dominica. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 2 indexed citations
10.
Smyrl, William H., et al.. (1995). Microvisualization of corrosion. Materials Science and Engineering A. 198(1-2). 177–196. 18 indexed citations
11.
Douglas, Leo R., et al.. (1957). The Corrosion of Iron in High-Temperature Water: Part 1—Corrosion Rate Measurements (Part 1 of 2 Parts). CORROSION. 13(6). 19–32. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026