Lene Martin
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Peter WangerLena Marmstål HammarAnnelie K. GusdalEva Thors AdolfssonKarin JosefssonAnn HellströmKristina Teär FahnehjelmLena Jacobson
- Topics
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders (22 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (15 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (12 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited KingdomThailand
In The Last Decade
Lene Martin
55 papers receiving 815 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Ophthalmology 305
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 283
- Epidemiology 129
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 118
- General Health Professions 86
Countries citing papers authored by Lene Martin
This map shows the geographic impact of Lene Martin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lene Martin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lene Martin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lene Martin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lene Martin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lene Martin. The network helps show where Lene Martin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lene Martin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lene Martin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lene Martin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lene Martin. Lene Martin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Lene Martin
Lene Martin is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Research and Theory and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 848 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (22 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (15 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (305 citations), Occupational Therapy (60 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (283 citations). Lene Martin has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Peter Wanger, Lena Marmstål Hammar, Annelie K. Gusdal, Eva Thors Adolfsson, Karin Josefsson, Ann Hellström, Kristina Teär Fahnehjelm, Lena Jacobson, Eva Larsson and Gerd Holmström. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.