422 total citations 3 papers, 65 citations indexed
About
Leland E. Hinsie is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and Infectious Diseases.
According to data from OpenAlex, Leland E. Hinsie has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 65 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Clinical Psychology, 1 paper in Philosophy and 0 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Leland E. Hinsie's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). Leland E. Hinsie is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). Leland E. Hinsie collaborates with scholars based in United States. Leland E. Hinsie's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Quarterly and Marriage and Family Living.
Countries citing papers authored by Leland E. Hinsie
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Leland E. Hinsie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leland E. Hinsie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leland E. Hinsie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leland E. Hinsie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leland E. Hinsie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leland E. Hinsie. The network helps show where Leland E. Hinsie may publish in the future.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.