Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Retinal Vasculitis and Intraocular Inflammation after Intravitreal Injection of Brolucizumab
2020227 citationsCaroline R. Baumal, Richard F. Spaide et al.Ophthalmologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Lejla Vajzovic
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lejla Vajzovic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lejla Vajzovic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lejla Vajzovic more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lejla Vajzovic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lejla Vajzovic. The network helps show where Lejla Vajzovic may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lejla Vajzovic
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lejla Vajzovic.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lejla Vajzovic based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lejla Vajzovic. Lejla Vajzovic is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brodie, Frank, Ryan P. McNabb, William Raynor, et al.. (2021). Ex vivo evaluation of the peripheral retina utilizing a mirrored contact with optical coherence tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 62(8). 3104–3104.
Viehland, Christian, Al-Hafeez Dhalla, William Raynor, et al.. (2020). High Speed Volumetric Intrasurgical Optical Coherence Tomography at 400 kHz with Real Time, 4D Visualization of Surgical Maneuvers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 61(7). 3244–3244.1 indexed citations
13.
Baumal, Caroline R., Richard F. Spaide, Lejla Vajzovic, et al.. (2020). Retinal Vasculitis and Intraocular Inflammation after Intravitreal Injection of Brolucizumab. Ophthalmology. 127(10). 1345–1359.227 indexed citations breakdown →
Stinnett, Sandra S., Ulrich F. O. Luhmann, Lejla Vajzovic, et al.. (2018). Use of mobile MyVisionTrack (mVT) technology as a remote visual function metric in Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(9). 2430–2430.1 indexed citations
17.
Chen, Xi, Tamer H. Mahmoud, Lejla Vajzovic, et al.. (2017). Visualization from microscope-integrated swept-source OCT in vitreoretinal surgery for diabetic tractional retinal detachment. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 3777–3777.1 indexed citations
18.
Stinnett, Sandra S., et al.. (2017). Visual function endpoints in early and intermediate dry age-related macular degeneration for use as clinical trial endpoints. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 3765–3765.1 indexed citations
19.
Vajzovic, Lejla, Karim Sleiman, Oscar Carrasco‐Zevallos, et al.. (2017). Subretinal Therapy Delivery Technique Guided by Intraoperative 4-Dimensional Microscope-Integrated Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 3122–3122.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.