This map shows the geographic impact of Leïla Amgoud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leïla Amgoud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leïla Amgoud more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leïla Amgoud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leïla Amgoud. The network helps show where Leïla Amgoud may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leïla Amgoud
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leïla Amgoud.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leïla Amgoud based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Leïla Amgoud. Leïla Amgoud is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Amgoud, Leïla. (2020). Explaining Black-box Classification Models with Arguments. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
Amgoud, Leïla, Philippe Besnard, & Anthony Hunter. (2017). Foundations for a logic of arguments. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics. 27(3-4). 178–195.4 indexed citations
4.
Amgoud, Leïla, et al.. (2013). A formal general setting for dialogue protocols.
Amgoud, Leïla & Srdjan Vesić. (2009). Repairing preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 665–670.16 indexed citations
9.
Amgoud, Leïla, et al.. (2009). Contribution aux comparaisons formelles des modèles de préférences en argumentation. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 81–92.1 indexed citations
10.
Dimopoulos, Yannis, Pavlos Moraı̈tis, & Leïla Amgoud. (2008). Characterizing the Outcomes of Argumentation-Based Integrative Negotiation.. 456–460.1 indexed citations
Amgoud, Leïla & Henri Prade. (2005). Handling threats, rewards, and explanatory arguments in a unified setting: Research Articles. Journal of Intelligent Systems. 20(12). 1195–1218.5 indexed citations
15.
Amgoud, Leïla, et al.. (2005). Formal handling of threats and rewards in a negotiation dialogue.
16.
Amgoud, Leïla, et al.. (2004). Threat, reward and explanatory arguments: generation and evaluation. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
17.
Amgoud, Leïla & Nicolas Maudet. (2002). Strategical considerations for argumentative agents (preliminary report).. 399–407.19 indexed citations
18.
Amgoud, Leïla, et al.. (2002). Agent dialogues with conflicting preferences. Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln).2 indexed citations
19.
Amgoud, Leïla, et al.. (2002). An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).
20.
Amgoud, Leïla. (1998). Using Preferences to Select Acceptable Arguments.. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 43–44.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.