Leigh Shaw‐Taylor

915 total citations
22 papers, 473 citations indexed

About

Leigh Shaw‐Taylor is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Leigh Shaw‐Taylor has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 473 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Leigh Shaw‐Taylor's work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (13 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers). Leigh Shaw‐Taylor is often cited by papers focused on Historical Economic and Social Studies (13 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers). Leigh Shaw‐Taylor collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Leigh Shaw‐Taylor's co-authors include Max Satchell, Michael Stuetzer, Martin Obschonka, Peter J. Rentfrow, David B. Audretsch, Michael Wyrwich, Mike Coombes, Romola Davenport, Dan Bogart and Rainer Κ. Silbereisen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Social Science & Medicine and The Economic Journal.

In The Last Decade

Leigh Shaw‐Taylor

20 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Leigh Shaw‐Taylor

SPS

MTI

HISTO

DEMOG

Max Satchell United Kingdom

John Shutt United Kingdom

Peter Saunders Australia

Alberto Gimeno Spain

John Atkinson United Kingdom

Peter Gordon United States

Scott Cummings United States

Katharine McKinnon Australia

Ines Smyth United Kingdom

Nora Dudwick United Kingdom

Max Satchell United Kingdom

Leigh Shaw‐Taylor

110 ×0.5

91 ×0.9

SPS

82 ×1.0

MTI

10 ×0.2

HISTO

39 ×0.8

DEMOG

Citations per year, relative to Leigh Shaw‐Taylor Leigh Shaw‐Taylor (= 1×) peers Max Satchell

Countries citing papers authored by Leigh Shaw‐Taylor

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leigh Shaw‐Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leigh Shaw‐Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leigh Shaw‐Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leigh Shaw‐Taylor

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leigh Shaw‐Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leigh Shaw‐Taylor. The network helps show where Leigh Shaw‐Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leigh Shaw‐Taylor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leigh Shaw‐Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leigh Shaw‐Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leigh Shaw‐Taylor. Leigh Shaw‐Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Coustaty, Mickaël, et al.. (2024). Built-up areas of nineteenth-century Britain. An integrated methodology for extracting high-resolution urban footprints from historical maps. Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History. 57(1). 1–19.

Álvarez-Palau, Eduard J., Dan Bogart, Max Satchell, & Leigh Shaw‐Taylor. (2024). Transport and urban growth in the First Industrial Revolution. The Economic Journal. 135(668). 1191–1228. 3 indexed citations

Sugden, Keith, et al.. (2023). Adam Smith revisited: the relationship between the English woollen manufacture and the availability of coal before the use of steam power. Continuity and Change. 38(2). 163–191. 1 indexed citations

Rosevear, A., Dan Bogart, & Leigh Shaw‐Taylor. (2023). Government, trusts, and the making of better roads in early nineteenth century England and Wales. European Review of Economic History. 28(3). 399–423. 2 indexed citations

Jaadla, Hannaliis, Leigh Shaw‐Taylor, & Romola Davenport. (2020). Height and health in late eighteenth-century England. Population Studies. 75(3). 381–401. 8 indexed citations

Shaw‐Taylor, Leigh. (2020). An introduction to the history of infectious diseases, epidemics and the early phases of the long‐run decline in mortality†. The Economic History Review. 73(3). E1–E19. 39 indexed citations

Daly, Michael, Martin Obschonka, Michael Stuetzer, et al.. (2020). Neuroticism mediates the relationship between industrial history and modern‐day regional obesity levels. Journal of Personality. 89(2). 276–287. 1 indexed citations

Bogart, Dan, et al.. (2020). Speedier delivery: coastal shipping times and speeds during the Age of Sail †. The Economic History Review. 74(1). 87–114. 7 indexed citations

Rosevear, A., Dan Bogart, & Leigh Shaw‐Taylor. (2019). The spatial patterns of coaching in England and Wales from 1681 to 1836: A geographic information systems approach. The Journal of Transport History. 40(3). 418–444. 1 indexed citations

10.

Davenport, Romola, Max Satchell, & Leigh Shaw‐Taylor. (2018). The geography of smallpox in England before vaccination: A conundrum resolved. Social Science & Medicine. 206. 75–85. 18 indexed citations

11.

Davenport, Romola, Max Satchell, & Leigh Shaw‐Taylor. (2018). Cholera as a ‘sanitary test’ of British cities, 1831–1866. The History of the Family. 24(2). 404–438. 23 indexed citations

12.

Obschonka, Martin, Michael Stuetzer, Peter J. Rentfrow, et al.. (2017). In the shadow of coal: How large-scale industries contributed to present-day regional differences in personality and well-being.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 115(5). 903–927. 77 indexed citations

13.

Stuetzer, Michael, Martin Obschonka, David B. Audretsch, et al.. (2015). Industry structure, entrepreneurship, and culture: An empirical analysis using historical coalfields. European Economic Review. 86. 52–72. 136 indexed citations

14.

Shaw‐Taylor, Leigh. (2011). The rise of agrarian capitalism and the decline of family farming in England¹. The Economic History Review. 65(1). 26–60. 33 indexed citations

15.

Shaw‐Taylor, Leigh, et al.. (2010). The occupational structure of England c.1710 to c.1871 Work in progress. 4 indexed citations

16.

Shaw‐Taylor, Leigh & E. A. Wrigley. (2006). The Occupational Structure of England c.1750-1871 A Preliminary Report. 8 indexed citations

17.

Shaw‐Taylor, Leigh. (2005). Family farms and capitalist farms in mid nineteenth-century England. 53(2). 158–191. 8 indexed citations

18.

Shaw‐Taylor, Leigh. (2002). John Chapman and Sylvia Seeliger, Enclosure, environment and landscape in southern England. 14(50). 280–819. 1 indexed citations

19.

Shaw‐Taylor, Leigh. (2001). PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE AND THE EMERGENCE OF AN ENGLISH AGRICULTURAL PROLETARIAT. The Journal of Economic History. 61(3). 640–662. 38 indexed citations

20.

Shaw‐Taylor, Leigh. (2001). LABOURERS, COWS, COMMON RIGHTS AND PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE: THE EVIDENCE OF CONTEMPORARY COMMENT c.1760–1810. Past & Present. 171(1). 95–126. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact