Lee T. Lemon is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education and Anthropology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Lee T. Lemon has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 394 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Education and 1 paper in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in Lee T. Lemon's work include Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies (2 papers), Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (2 papers) and European Linguistics and Anthropology (1 paper). Lee T. Lemon is often cited by papers focused on Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies (2 papers), Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (2 papers) and European Linguistics and Anthropology (1 paper). Lee T. Lemon collaborates with scholars based in . Lee T. Lemon's co-authors include Robert Hughes, René Wellek, Gary Saul Morson, Theodore M. Greene, Linda Nelson, James A. Magner and John Katz and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The Slavic and East European Journal and Oxford University Press eBooks.
In The Last Decade
Lee T. Lemon
5 papers
receiving
223 citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays
1968343 citationsRobert Hughes, Lee T. Lemon et al.The Slavic and East European Journalprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Lee T. Lemon Lee T. Lemon (= 1×)
peers
Hazard Adams
Countries citing papers authored by Lee T. Lemon
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lee T. Lemon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee T. Lemon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee T. Lemon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee T. Lemon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee T. Lemon. The network helps show where Lee T. Lemon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lee T. Lemon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lee T. Lemon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lee T. Lemon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lee T. Lemon. Lee T. Lemon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Lemon, Lee T., et al.. (2012). Russian formalist criticism : four essays.11 indexed citations
2.
Lemon, Lee T.. (1985). Portraits of the Artist in Contemporary Fiction. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
Lemon, Lee T.. (1969). Approaches to literature. Oxford University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
6.
Hughes, Robert, et al.. (1968). Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. The Slavic and East European Journal. 12(3). 367–367.343 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Lemon, Lee T. & René Wellek. (1966). A History of Modern Criticism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 25(2). 231–231.28 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.