Lee R. Jeppson

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
54 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Lee R. Jeppson is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lee R. Jeppson has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Insect Science, 30 papers in Plant Science and 13 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Lee R. Jeppson's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (36 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (21 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (13 papers). Lee R. Jeppson is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (36 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (21 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (13 papers). Lee R. Jeppson collaborates with scholars based in United States. Lee R. Jeppson's co-authors include Edward W. Baker, Hartford H. Keifer, F. A. Günther, G. E. Carman, Roman Hobza, J. A. McMurtry, H. G. Johnson, W. E. Westlake, R. C. Blinn and C. A. Fleschner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Annual Review of Entomology and Journal of Economic Entomology.

In The Last Decade

Lee R. Jeppson

48 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Mites Injurious to Economic Plants 1975 2026 1992 2009 1975 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lee R. Jeppson United States 8 1.3k 703 610 159 123 54 1.4k
Hartford H. Keifer United States 9 1.6k 1.2× 1.0k 1.5× 719 1.2× 234 1.5× 117 1.0× 14 1.8k
R. D. Eikenbary United States 20 1.2k 1.0× 467 0.7× 877 1.4× 172 1.1× 196 1.6× 81 1.4k
N. W. Hussey United Kingdom 16 773 0.6× 292 0.4× 427 0.7× 170 1.1× 174 1.4× 56 998
M. T. Aliniazee United States 18 713 0.6× 273 0.4× 259 0.4× 261 1.6× 74 0.6× 73 803
J. A. T. Woodford United Kingdom 18 526 0.4× 185 0.3× 540 0.9× 158 1.0× 140 1.1× 58 859
Edward B. Radcliffe United States 23 1.2k 0.9× 283 0.4× 1.4k 2.2× 114 0.7× 274 2.2× 87 1.7k
N. E. A. Scopes United Kingdom 12 629 0.5× 276 0.4× 402 0.7× 92 0.6× 102 0.8× 21 762
D. L. Flaherty United States 15 604 0.5× 318 0.5× 307 0.5× 110 0.7× 61 0.5× 40 699
J. Granett United States 23 1.2k 1.0× 525 0.7× 1.1k 1.8× 482 3.0× 262 2.1× 117 1.8k
Douglass R. Miller United States 17 1.2k 1.0× 764 1.1× 337 0.6× 91 0.6× 108 0.9× 62 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Lee R. Jeppson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lee R. Jeppson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee R. Jeppson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee R. Jeppson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lee R. Jeppson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee R. Jeppson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee R. Jeppson. The network helps show where Lee R. Jeppson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lee R. Jeppson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lee R. Jeppson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lee R. Jeppson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lee R. Jeppson. Lee R. Jeppson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jeppson, Lee R., Hartford H. Keifer, & Edward W. Baker. (2023). Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. 2 indexed citations
2.
Jeppson, Lee R., et al.. (1976). Morphology of the Mouthparts of Several Species of Phytophagous Mites. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 69(6). 1125–1135. 25 indexed citations
3.
Jeppson, Lee R., et al.. (1975). Toxicity of Citrus Pesticides to Some Predaceous Phytoseiid Mites1. Journal of Economic Entomology. 68(5). 707–710. 25 indexed citations
4.
Jeppson, Lee R., Hartford H. Keifer, & Edward W. Baker. (1975). Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. 1185 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Hobza, Roman & Lee R. Jeppson. (1974). A Temperature and Humidity Study of Citrus Rust Mite1Employing a Constant Humidity Air-flow Technique2. Environmental Entomology. 3(5). 813–822. 14 indexed citations
6.
Westlake, W. E., Francis A. Günther, & Lee R. Jeppson. (1971). Persistence of Omite residues on and in navel oranges nd lemons and in laboratory-processed citrus pulp cattle feed. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 19(5). 894–896. 1 indexed citations
7.
Jeppson, Lee R., et al.. (1968). Responses of the Pacific Spider Mite and the Citrus Red Mite to Laboratory and Field Applications of Tricyclohexyl Tin Hydroxide. Journal of Economic Entomology. 61(6). 1502–1505. 2 indexed citations
9.
Jeppson, Lee R., et al.. (1962). Laboratory Studies on Resistance of the Pacific Spider Mite to Acaricides1. Journal of Economic Entomology. 55(1). 78–82. 3 indexed citations
10.
Jeppson, Lee R., et al.. (1961). Factors Influencing Citrus Red Mite Populations on Navel Oranges and Scheduling of Acaricide Applications in Southern California1. Journal of Economic Entomology. 54(1). 55–60. 1 indexed citations
11.
DeBach, Paul, et al.. (1959). Integrated control measures: Experiments in lemon grove near Carpinteria showed selective miticides to be compatible with biological control of red scale. California Agriculture. 13(7). 12–12. 2 indexed citations
12.
Günther, F. A., et al.. (1959). Pesticide Residues, Residual Behavior of S-(p-Chlorophenylthio)methyl O,O-Diethyl Phosphorodithioate (Trithion) on and in Mature Lemons and Oranges. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 7(1). 28–30. 4 indexed citations
13.
Wedding, Randolph T., et al.. (1958). Red mite on citrus: Experiments designed to measure damage give bases for further studies. California Agriculture. 12(8). 9–12. 3 indexed citations
14.
Jeppson, Lee R.. (1958). Citrus mite control: Effective new acaricide of low toxicity to insects registered for use on citrus. California Agriculture. 12(7). 13–13.
15.
Jeppson, Lee R., et al.. (1957). Effect of Timing of Oil Spray Applications During the Fall on Juice Quality and Yield of Lemons in Two Orchards in Southern California1. Journal of Economic Entomology. 50(1). 74–76. 1 indexed citations
16.
Jeppson, Lee R., et al.. (1957). Influence of Season and Weather on Citrus Red Mite Populations on Lemons in Southern California1. Journal of Economic Entomology. 50(3). 293–300. 7 indexed citations
17.
Jeppson, Lee R.. (1955). New acaricide for citrus mites: Chlorobenzilate formulations have low toxicity to warm-blooded animals but in tests gave effective control of mites on citrus. California Agriculture. 9(6). 11–11. 1 indexed citations
18.
Jeppson, Lee R., et al.. (1954). Seasonal Weather Influence on Efficiency of Systox Applications for Control of Mites on lemons in Southern California1. Journal of Economic Entomology. 47(3). 520–525. 1 indexed citations
19.
Jeppson, Lee R.. (1951). New Acaricides for Control of Citrus Red Mite, 1948–19501. Journal of Economic Entomology. 44(6). 823–832. 4 indexed citations
20.
Jeppson, Lee R.. (1951). Bis-(p-Chlorophenoxy)-Methane in Relation to the Control of Citrus Red Mite and Other Mites Injurious to Citrus in California1. Journal of Economic Entomology. 44(3). 328–337. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026