Lee Pyne‐Mercier
Impact in
- Microbiology top 10%
- Reproductive tract infections research
-
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Papers in
-
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 3
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology 1
-
- Global Maternal and Child Health 2
- Maternal and fetal healthcare 1
- Co-authors
- Melanie Taylor (3 shared papers)Morkor Newman Owiredu (2 shared papers)Nancy Kidula (1 shared paper)Maeve B. Mello (1 shared paper)Leopold Ouédraogo (1 shared paper)Michael L. Campbell (1 shared paper)James V. Lavery (1 shared paper)Erica Lessem (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Lancet Global Health (2 papers)The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (1 paper)PLoS Medicine (1 paper)The Lancet Infectious Diseases (1 paper)International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Lee Pyne‐Mercier
8 papers receiving 240 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Microbiology 69
- Infectious Diseases 97
- Physiology 112
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 5
- General Social Sciences 8
Countries citing papers authored by Lee Pyne‐Mercier
This map shows the geographic impact of Lee Pyne‐Mercier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee Pyne‐Mercier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee Pyne‐Mercier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lee Pyne‐Mercier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee Pyne‐Mercier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee Pyne‐Mercier. The network helps show where Lee Pyne‐Mercier may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lee Pyne‐Mercier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 117 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 8 |
About Lee Pyne‐Mercier
Lee Pyne‐Mercier is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology, Epidemiology and General Health Professions, having authored 8 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (1 paper), Maternal and fetal healthcare (1 paper) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (69 citations), Infectious Diseases (97 citations), Physiology (112 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (5 citations) and General Social Sciences (8 citations). Lee Pyne‐Mercier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Melanie Taylor, Morkor Newman Owiredu, Nancy Kidula, Maeve B. Mello, Leopold Ouédraogo, Michael L. Campbell, James V. Lavery, Erica Lessem, Grace John‐Stewart and Barbra A. Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Global Health, The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, PLoS Medicine, The Lancet Infectious Diseases and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.