Lee Pyne‐Mercier

443 total citations
8 papers, 248 citations indexed

About

Lee Pyne‐Mercier is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lee Pyne‐Mercier has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 248 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Infectious Diseases, 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 3 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Lee Pyne‐Mercier's work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers). Lee Pyne‐Mercier is often cited by papers focused on HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers). Lee Pyne‐Mercier collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Lee Pyne‐Mercier's co-authors include Melanie Taylor, Morkor Newman Owiredu, Leopold Ouédraogo, Nancy Kidula, Maeve B. Mello, Michael L. Campbell, Cherise P. Scott, Barbra A. Richardson, Michael H. Chung and James V. Lavery and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS Medicine, The Lancet Infectious Diseases and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.

In The Last Decade

Lee Pyne‐Mercier

8 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lee Pyne‐Mercier United States 8 112 97 69 69 52 8 248
Kathryn Miele United States 8 119 1.1× 116 1.2× 94 1.4× 53 0.8× 65 1.3× 13 286
Tara Mtuy United Kingdom 11 37 0.3× 60 0.6× 80 1.2× 60 0.9× 50 1.0× 30 248
Dorothy C. Nyemba South Africa 11 85 0.8× 149 1.5× 83 1.2× 128 1.9× 27 0.5× 27 297
Morkor Newman Owiredu Switzerland 8 155 1.4× 120 1.2× 72 1.0× 88 1.3× 44 0.8× 11 261
Lusi Osborn United States 8 44 0.4× 127 1.3× 96 1.4× 101 1.5× 44 0.8× 19 287
Mónica Alonso United States 7 262 2.3× 80 0.8× 88 1.3× 126 1.8× 76 1.5× 9 346
Mary Catherine Cambou United States 11 45 0.4× 91 0.9× 105 1.5× 26 0.4× 99 1.9× 39 324
Séverine Caluwaerts Belgium 8 45 0.4× 132 1.4× 61 0.9× 35 0.5× 43 0.8× 17 268
Nashaba Matin United Kingdom 8 106 0.9× 153 1.6× 129 1.9× 47 0.7× 27 0.5× 14 295
Adèle Schwartz Benzaken Brazil 7 41 0.4× 139 1.4× 90 1.3× 13 0.2× 25 0.5× 15 212

Countries citing papers authored by Lee Pyne‐Mercier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lee Pyne‐Mercier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee Pyne‐Mercier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee Pyne‐Mercier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lee Pyne‐Mercier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee Pyne‐Mercier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee Pyne‐Mercier. The network helps show where Lee Pyne‐Mercier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lee Pyne‐Mercier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lee Pyne‐Mercier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lee Pyne‐Mercier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lee Pyne‐Mercier. Lee Pyne‐Mercier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Storey, Andrew, et al.. (2019). Syphilis diagnosis and treatment during antenatal care: the potential catalytic impact of the dual HIV and syphilis rapid diagnostic test. The Lancet Global Health. 7(8). e1006–e1008. 16 indexed citations
2.
Xiong, Xu, Rebecca A. Carter, Paul-Samson Lusamba-Dikassa, et al.. (2019). Improving the quality of maternal and newborn health outcomes through a clinical mentorship program in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: study protocol. Reproductive Health. 16(1). 147–147. 14 indexed citations
3.
Taylor, Melanie, Harriet D. Gliddon, Maura Laverty, et al.. (2017). Revisiting strategies to eliminate mother-to-child transmission of syphilis. The Lancet Global Health. 6(1). e26–e28. 8 indexed citations
4.
Taylor, Melanie, Maeve B. Mello, Michael L. Campbell, et al.. (2017). Shortages of benzathine penicillin for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis: An evaluation from multi-country surveys and stakeholder interviews. PLoS Medicine. 14(12). e1002473–e1002473. 117 indexed citations
5.
Dadelszen, Peter von, Laura A. Magee, Beth A. Payne, et al.. (2015). Moving beyond silos: How do we provide distributed personalized medicine to pregnant women everywhere at scale? Insights from PRE‐EMPT. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 131(S1). S10–5. 9 indexed citations
6.
Lessem, Erica, et al.. (2013). Engaging communities in tuberculosis research. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 13(6). 540–545. 32 indexed citations
7.
Horsburgh, C. Robert, Christian Lienhardt, Claire Wingfield, et al.. (2012). Compassionate use of and expanded access to new drugs for drug-resistant tuberculosis [Review article]. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 17(2). 146–152. 19 indexed citations
8.
Pyne‐Mercier, Lee, et al.. (2011). The consequences of post-election violence on antiretroviral HIV therapy in Kenya. AIDS Care. 23(5). 562–568. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathryn Miele Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tara Mtuy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dorothy C. Nyemba Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Morkor Newman Owiredu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lusi Osborn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mónica Alonso Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary Catherine Cambou Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Séverine Caluwaerts Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nashaba Matin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Adèle Schwartz Benzaken
Rankless by CCL
2026