Leah Campbell

419 total citations
8 papers, 156 citations indexed

About

Leah Campbell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Leah Campbell has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 156 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Leah Campbell's work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers). Leah Campbell is often cited by papers focused on Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers). Leah Campbell collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Leah Campbell's co-authors include Michael J. Mason, Thomas Way, Jeremy Mennis, Lori Keyser‐Marcus, Nikola Zaharakis, Laura King, Eric G. Benotsch, John M. Light, Jing Zhang and James May and has published in prestigious journals such as Addictive Behaviors, Health & Place and Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics.

In The Last Decade

Leah Campbell

8 papers receiving 147 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Leah Campbell United States 6 64 39 37 36 36 8 156
Meme Wang‐Schweig United States 7 90 1.4× 60 1.5× 21 0.6× 57 1.6× 146 4.1× 12 260
Danielle Giroux United States 8 137 2.1× 71 1.8× 63 1.7× 35 1.0× 84 2.3× 9 225
Arilton Martins Fonseca Brazil 6 97 1.5× 50 1.3× 16 0.4× 29 0.8× 106 2.9× 9 304
Allison N. Kristman-Valente United States 8 75 1.2× 125 3.2× 10 0.3× 21 0.6× 50 1.4× 14 219
Kent Johnsson Sweden 10 120 1.9× 64 1.6× 78 2.1× 27 0.8× 206 5.7× 15 295
Astrid Skretting Norway 9 57 0.9× 34 0.9× 13 0.4× 24 0.7× 121 3.4× 43 204
Nicole D. Gehring Canada 8 92 1.4× 46 1.2× 66 1.8× 28 0.8× 39 1.1× 16 208
Florence Jaguga Kenya 8 78 1.2× 78 2.0× 28 0.8× 24 0.7× 41 1.1× 34 211
Silke Diestelkamp Germany 8 59 0.9× 91 2.3× 51 1.4× 28 0.8× 63 1.8× 26 192
Lianna Angel United Kingdom 9 44 0.7× 56 1.4× 17 0.5× 16 0.4× 22 0.6× 21 169

Countries citing papers authored by Leah Campbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leah Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leah Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leah Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leah Campbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leah Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leah Campbell. The network helps show where Leah Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leah Campbell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leah Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leah Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leah Campbell. Leah Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Campbell, Leah. (2017). Depression and Marijuana Use among a Sample of Urban Females: Is Stage of Development Important?. Substance Use & Misuse. 53(6). 1008–1014. 3 indexed citations
2.
Mason, Michael J., Jeremy Mennis, Thomas Way, et al.. (2016). Text Message Delivered Peer Network Counseling for Adolescent Smokers: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 37(5). 403–420. 27 indexed citations
3.
Mason, Michael J., John M. Light, Leah Campbell, et al.. (2015). Peer Network Counseling with Urban Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Moderate Substance Users. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 58. 16–24. 32 indexed citations
4.
Mason, Michael J., Jeremy Mennis, Thomas Way, & Leah Campbell. (2015). Real-Time Readiness to Quit and Peer Smoking within a Text Message Intervention for Adolescent Smokers: Modeling Mechanisms of Change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 59. 67–73. 11 indexed citations
5.
Campbell, Leah, Kristin Wilmoth, & Michael J. Mason. (2015). Association of exposure to neighborhood drug activity, neurobehavioral traits, and marijuana use among at-risk African American females. Addictive Behaviors. 50. 45–50. 4 indexed citations
6.
Mason, Michael J., Jeremy Mennis, Thomas Way, et al.. (2015). Young adolescents' perceived activity space risk, peer networks, and substance use. Health & Place. 34. 143–149. 29 indexed citations
7.
Mason, Michael J., Leah Campbell, Nikola Zaharakis, Robin L. Foster, & Susan Richards. (2014). Levels of Teen Dating Violence and Substance Use in an Urban Emergency Department. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 35(9). 576–581. 8 indexed citations
8.
Mason, Michael J., Leah Campbell, Thomas Way, et al.. (2014). Development and Outcomes of a Text Messaging Tobacco Cessation Intervention with Urban Adolescents. Substance Abuse. 36(4). 500–506. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026