Leah Acker

1.3k citations
24 papers · 735 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Leah Acker

21 papers receiving 728 citations

Peers

Leah Acker
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 463
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 67
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 232
  • Developmental Neuroscience 39
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 21
Replace Tian Yu with:
Tian Yu China
Meng‐Li Tsai Taiwan
Christiane Vahle-Hinz Germany
Sachi Ohno Japan
Joost le Feber Netherlands
Kieran P. Normoyle United States
Derek Lumbard United States
James Anstey United States
Bo Lei China
Kameel M. Karkar United States
Leah Acker relative to Tian Yu China Tian Yu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tian Yu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leah Acker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leah Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leah Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leah Acker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leah Acker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leah Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leah Acker. The network helps show where Leah Acker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leah Acker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leah Acker Line = papers co-authored together Leah Acker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Noninvasive optical inhibition with a red-shifted microbial rhodopsin
2014380
2 201796
3 201673
4 201072
5 202223
6 202318
7 202115
8 202313
9 202112
10 202310
11 20225
12 20253
13 20173
14 20073
15 20192
16 20072
17 20211
18 20251
19 19981
20 20241

About Leah Acker

Leah Acker is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (10 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers) and Engineering Education and Pedagogy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (463 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (67 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (232 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (39 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (21 citations). Leah Acker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Edward S. Boyden, Robert Desimone, Andrew J. Young, Volker Busskamp, Masaaki Ogawa, Craig R. Forest, Botond Roska, Jessica A. Cardin, Brian D. Allen and Nathan C Klapoetke. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Medical Physics and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact