Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy
2012776 citationsL.C. Braat, R.S. de GrootEcosystem Servicesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of L.C. Braat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.C. Braat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.C. Braat more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.C. Braat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.C. Braat. The network helps show where L.C. Braat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L.C. Braat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L.C. Braat.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L.C. Braat based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with L.C. Braat. L.C. Braat is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pérez‐Soba, Marta, A. Cormont, Peter Verweij, et al.. (2015). Training member states on ecosystem services mapping through hands on workshops. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
5.
Braat, L.C.. (2014). Ecosystem Services: the Ecology and Economics of Current Debates. 20–35.9 indexed citations
Braat, L.C. & R.S. de Groot. (2012). The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosystem Services. 1(1). 4–15.776 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Braat, L.C., et al.. (2010). Policy options for a future EU biodiversity strategy. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
9.
Braat, L.C., Bin Fu, Peter Kareiva, et al.. (2010). Ecosystem service and management strategy in China. CCICED Task Force Report. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
10.
Braat, L.C., et al.. (2010). Costs and benefits assessment of monitoring approaches for measuring progress towards the EU 2020 biodiversity target. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
11.
Balmford, Andrew, et al.. (2008). The ecomics of ecosystems and biodiversity: scoping the scale. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).19 indexed citations
12.
Braat, L.C., Patrick ten Brink, & Ted Klok. (2008). The cost of policy inaction : the case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 2008.99 indexed citations
13.
Gilbert, A. & L.C. Braat. (1991). Modelling for Population and Sustainable Development. Medical Entomology and Zoology.7 indexed citations
14.
Braat, L.C., et al.. (1987). Economic-ecological modeling. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).26 indexed citations
Braat, L.C., et al.. (1985). A Survey of Economic-Ecological Models. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).5 indexed citations
20.
Braat, L.C., et al.. (1979). Functions of the natural environment: an economic - ecological analysis..6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.