Laurie Robak

5.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 583 citations indexed

About

Laurie Robak is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Laurie Robak has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 583 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 4 papers in Developmental Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Laurie Robak's work include Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers). Laurie Robak is often cited by papers focused on Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers). Laurie Robak collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Laurie Robak's co-authors include Hui Ye, Joshua Shulman, Matthew D. Cykowski, Karthik Venkatesh, Hakjoo Lee, Roman J. Giger, Rebecca Geary, Hermes H. Yeh, Peter Shrager and Yu Zhang and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Neurology and Human Molecular Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Laurie Robak

9 papers receiving 578 citations

Hit Papers

Genetics and Pathogenesis of Parkinson's Syndrome 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 50 100 150 200

Peers

Laurie Robak
Diogo Trigo Portugal
Bala T. S. Susarla United States
Chew L. Lau Australia
Hey‐Kyeong Jeong South Korea
Seema Shroff United States
Bhuvaneish T. Selvaraj United Kingdom
Diogo Trigo Portugal
Laurie Robak
Citations per year, relative to Laurie Robak Laurie Robak (= 1×) peers Diogo Trigo

Countries citing papers authored by Laurie Robak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurie Robak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurie Robak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurie Robak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurie Robak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurie Robak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurie Robak. The network helps show where Laurie Robak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurie Robak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurie Robak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurie Robak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurie Robak. Laurie Robak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Choi, Tae‐Ik, Yu‐Ri Lee, Laurie Robak, et al.. (2024). RFC2 may contribute to the pathogenicity of Williams syndrome revealed in a zebrafish model. Journal of genetics and genomics. 51(12). 1389–1403. 1 indexed citations
2.
Morrow, Michelle, Erin Torti, Kirsty McWalter, et al.. (2024). MGA-related syndrome: A proposed novel disorder. Human Genetics and Genomics Advances. 6(1). 100387–100387.
3.
Ye, Hui, et al.. (2022). Genetics and Pathogenesis of Parkinson's Syndrome. Annual Review of Pathology Mechanisms of Disease. 18(1). 95–121. 235 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Jiang, Ming‐Ming, Xiaohui Li, Ronit Marom, et al.. (2021). A novel de novo intronic variant in ITPR1 causes Gillespie syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 185(8). 2315–2324. 5 indexed citations
5.
Chen, Chun‐An, Harinder Gill, Tanya N. Nelson, et al.. (2020). The expanding clinical phenotype of germline ABL1 ‐associated congenital heart defects and skeletal malformations syndrome. Human Mutation. 41(10). 1738–1744. 11 indexed citations
6.
Batzir, Nurit Assia, Tanya N. Eble, Pengfei Liu, et al.. (2019). De novo missense variant in the GTPase effector domain (GED) of DNM1L leads to static encephalopathy and seizures. Molecular Case Studies. 5(3). a003673–a003673. 26 indexed citations
7.
Robak, Laurie, Iris E. Jansen, Jeroen van Rooij, et al.. (2017). Excessive burden of lysosomal storage disorder gene variants in Parkinson’s disease (S1.001). Neurology. 88(16_supplement).
8.
Robak, Laurie, Fan Xia, Mary Kay Koenig, et al.. (2016). Missense variants in the middle domain ofDNM1Lin cases of infantile encephalopathy alter peroxisomes and mitochondria when assayed inDrosophila. Human Molecular Genetics. 25(9). 1846–1856. 55 indexed citations
9.
Robak, Laurie, Karthik Venkatesh, Hakjoo Lee, et al.. (2009). Molecular Basis of the Interactions of the Nogo-66 Receptor and Its Homolog NgR2 with Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein: Development of NgROMNI-Fc, a Novel Antagonist of CNS Myelin Inhibition. Journal of Neuroscience. 29(18). 5768–5783. 45 indexed citations
10.
Giger, Roman J., Karthik Venkatesh, Onanong Chivatakarn, et al.. (2008). Mechanisms of CNS myelin inhibition: Evidence for distinct and neuronal cell type specific receptor systems. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 26(2-3). 97–115. 61 indexed citations
11.
Lee, Hakjoo, Karthik Venkatesh, Rebecca Geary, et al.. (2008). Synaptic Function for the Nogo-66 Receptor NgR1: Regulation of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Activity-Dependent Synaptic Strength. Journal of Neuroscience. 28(11). 2753–2765. 144 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026