Laurence J. Sloss
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kenneth M. BorowJohn J. CollinsWilliam GrossmanTift MannEugene BraunwaldLaurence H. GreenJames M. RippeJoseph S. Alpert
- Topics
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (8 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (6 papers)Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Laurence J. Sloss
27 papers receiving 741 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 604
- Epidemiology 277
- Surgery 227
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 209
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 123
Countries citing papers authored by Laurence J. Sloss
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurence J. Sloss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurence J. Sloss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurence J. Sloss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laurence J. Sloss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurence J. Sloss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurence J. Sloss. The network helps show where Laurence J. Sloss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurence J. Sloss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurence J. Sloss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurence J. Sloss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurence J. Sloss. Laurence J. Sloss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 96 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 242 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 59 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Laurence J. Sloss
Laurence J. Sloss is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Medical Laboratory Technology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 825 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (8 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (6 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (604 citations), Epidemiology (277 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (209 citations). Laurence J. Sloss has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth M. Borow, John J. Collins, William Grossman, Tift Mann, Eugene Braunwald, Laurence H. Green, James M. Rippe, Joseph S. Alpert, Michael J. Landzberg and Lawrence H. Cohn. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.