Laurence H. Field

47 papers receiving 863 citations

Peers

Laurence H. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 465
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 428
  • Genetics 297
  • Ecology 280
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 93
Replace Charles R. Fourtner with:
Charles R. Fourtner United States
M. D. Burns United Kingdom
Hans‐Willi Honegger Germany
Tateo Shimozawa Japan
Martin Dambach Germany
David L. Macmillan Australia
D. M. Guthrie United Kingdom
Axel Schmid Austria
K. Wiese Germany
Darrell R. Stokes United States
Laurence H. Field relative to Charles R. Fourtner United States Charles R. Fourtner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Charles R. Fourtner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laurence H. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurence H. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurence H. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurence H. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurence H. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurence H. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurence H. Field. The network helps show where Laurence H. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurence H. Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurence H. Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurence H. Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurence H. Field. Laurence H. Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 18
2 6
3 1
4 11
5 29
6 4
7 12
8 20
9 12
10 1
11 3
12 12
13 1
14 15
15 4
16 22
17
An Experimental Analysis of the Escape Response of the Gastropod Strombus maculatus
10
18 9
19
A Description and Experimental Analysis of Batesian Mimicry between a Marine Gastropod and an Amphipod
8
20 24

About Laurence H. Field

Laurence H. Field is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Developmental Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 47 papers that have together received 899 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (21 papers), Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy (15 papers) and Crustacean biology and ecology (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (465 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (428 citations) and Developmental Biology (44 citations). Laurence H. Field has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm Burrows, Hans‐Joachim Pflüger, James L. Larimer, Tom Matheson, Eldon E. Ball, David L. Macmillan, F. Claire Rind, Hiroshi Nishino, Winston J. Bailey and Alistair McVean. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Scientific Reports and Journal of Experimental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026