Laurence D. Smith

1.2k total citations
23 papers, 703 citations indexed

About

Laurence D. Smith is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Laurence D. Smith has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 703 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Laurence D. Smith's work include Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (5 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers). Laurence D. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (5 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers). Laurence D. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Laurence D. Smith's co-authors include Norman K. Denzin, D. Alan Stubbs, Lisa A. Best, Andrea Bastiani Archibald, John A. Nevin, Jean E. Roberts, Roxann Roberson‐Nay, Eric G. Freedman, Leon R. Dreyfus and J. Gregor Fetterman and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Psychologist and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

In The Last Decade

Laurence D. Smith

23 papers receiving 607 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Laurence D. Smith United States 12 288 132 119 100 90 23 703
Thomas Hardy Leahey United States 13 166 0.6× 268 2.0× 111 0.9× 288 2.9× 72 0.8× 35 774
Christopher D. Green Canada 15 69 0.2× 266 2.0× 149 1.3× 224 2.2× 93 1.0× 64 730
Jay L. Garfield United States 19 243 0.8× 227 1.7× 282 2.4× 23 0.2× 109 1.2× 87 1.5k
Jacques Vonèche Switzerland 6 151 0.5× 49 0.4× 61 0.5× 18 0.2× 30 0.3× 15 548
Howard Gardner United States 5 140 0.5× 158 1.2× 101 0.8× 24 0.2× 25 0.3× 6 646
Brian Foss United Kingdom 4 302 1.0× 102 0.8× 241 2.0× 12 0.1× 77 0.9× 5 965
A. Olding Australia 4 155 0.5× 85 0.6× 78 0.7× 12 0.1× 33 0.4× 7 486
Sylvia Kenig United States 4 84 0.3× 94 0.7× 77 0.6× 24 0.2× 24 0.3× 4 537
Roger L. Dominowski United States 18 613 2.1× 212 1.6× 551 4.6× 25 0.3× 45 0.5× 41 1.6k
Abraham S. Luchins United States 15 138 0.5× 206 1.6× 134 1.1× 30 0.3× 54 0.6× 93 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Laurence D. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurence D. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurence D. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurence D. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurence D. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurence D. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurence D. Smith. The network helps show where Laurence D. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurence D. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurence D. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurence D. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurence D. Smith. Laurence D. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Laurence D., et al.. (2006). Bringing history to life: Simulating landmark experiments in psychology.. History of Psychology. 9(2). 113–143. 3 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Laurence D., et al.. (2006). Visual Inscriptions in the Scientific Hierarchy. Science Communication. 27(3). 376–428. 34 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Laurence D., Lisa A. Best, & D. Alan Stubbs. (2003). Bolstering Science and Practice Through Graphism.. American Psychologist. 58(10). 818–819. 2 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Laurence D., Lisa A. Best, D. Alan Stubbs, Andrea Bastiani Archibald, & Roxann Roberson‐Nay. (2002). Constructing knowledge: The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology.. American Psychologist. 57(10). 749–761. 90 indexed citations
5.
Best, Lisa A., Laurence D. Smith, & D. Alan Stubbs. (2001). Graph use in psychology and other sciences. Behavioural Processes. 54(1-3). 155–165. 25 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Laurence D., et al.. (2000). Psychology without p values: Data analysis at the turn of the 19th Century.. American Psychologist. 55(2). 260–263. 15 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Laurence D., et al.. (2000). Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences:. Social Studies of Science. 30(1). 73–94. 99 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Laurence D., et al.. (1997). Sensitivity and Bias in Covariation Detection: A Direct Approach to a Tangled Issue. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 72(1). 79–98. 4 indexed citations
9.
Freedman, Eric G. & Laurence D. Smith. (1996). The role of data and theory in covariation assessment: Implications for the theory-ladenness of observation. ˜The œJournal of mind and behavior. 17(4). 15 indexed citations
10.
Stubbs, D. Alan, et al.. (1994). DURATION COMPARISON: RELATIVE STIMULUS DIFFERENCES, STIMULUS AGE, AND STIMULUS PREDICTIVENESS. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 62(1). 15–32. 6 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Laurence D.. (1993). Natural science and unnatural technology.. American Psychologist. 48(5). 588–589. 3 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Laurence D.. (1993). Making sense of epistemological pluralism: A response to ringen. New Ideas in Psychology. 11(2). 179–191. 2 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Laurence D.. (1992). On prediction and control: B. F. Skinner and the technological ideal of science.. American Psychologist. 47(2). 216–223. 1 indexed citations
14.
O’Donohue, William & Laurence D. Smith. (1992). Philosophical and psychological epistemologies in behaviorism and behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy. 23(2). 173–194. 5 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Laurence D.. (1992). On prediction and control: B. F. Skinner and the technological ideal of science.. American Psychologist. 47(2). 216–223. 67 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Laurence D., et al.. (1991). Behaviorism and Logical Positivism: A Reassessment of the Alliance.. Noûs. 25(3). 383–383. 44 indexed citations
17.
Dreyfus, Leon R., J. Gregor Fetterman, Laurence D. Smith, & D. Alan Stubbs. (1988). Discrimination of temporal relations by pigeons.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 14(4). 349–367. 25 indexed citations
18.
Denzin, Norman K. & Laurence D. Smith. (1988). Behaviorism and Logical Positivism: A Reassessment of the Alliance. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 17(2). 224–224. 146 indexed citations
19.
Amundson, Ron & Laurence D. Smith. (1984). Clark Hull, Robert Cummins, and Functional Analysis. Philosophy of Science. 51(4). 657–666. 9 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Laurence D.. (1981). Psychology and philosophy: Toward a realignment, 1905-1935. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 17(1). 28–37. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026