Laurence Cherfils
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Applied Mathematics top 2%
- Computational Mechanics top 5%
- Numerical Analysis top 5%
- Co-authors
- Alain MiranvilleYavdat Il’yasovSergey ZelikMădălina PetcuStefania GattiWen ZhangEduard FeireislLu Li
- Topics
- Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (33 papers)Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (30 papers)Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films (10 papers)
In The Last Decade
Laurence Cherfils
38 papers receiving 731 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 565
- Materials Chemistry 458
- Applied Mathematics 357
- Computational Mechanics 201
- Numerical Analysis 102
Countries citing papers authored by Laurence Cherfils
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurence Cherfils's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurence Cherfils with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurence Cherfils more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laurence Cherfils
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurence Cherfils. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurence Cherfils. The network helps show where Laurence Cherfils may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurence Cherfils
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurence Cherfils. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurence Cherfils based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurence Cherfils. Laurence Cherfils is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | Generalized Cahn-Hilliard equations with a logarithmic free energy. | 14 |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Laurence Cherfils
Laurence Cherfils is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Modeling and Simulation and Applied Mathematics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 796 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (33 papers), Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (30 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (565 citations), Applied Mathematics (357 citations) and Numerical Analysis (102 citations). Laurence Cherfils has collaborated with scholars based in France, China and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alain Miranville, Yavdat Il’yasov, Sergey Zelik, Mădălina Petcu, Stefania Gatti, Wen Zhang, Eduard Feireisl, Lu Li, Dalibor Pražák and Maurizio Grasselli. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications and Numerische Mathematik.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.