Laurel E. Redding

44 papers receiving 715 citations

Peers

Laurel E. Redding
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 79
  • Molecular Medicine 66
  • Equine 21
  • Small Animals 86
  • Microbiology 67
Replace Jackie Atkinson with:
Jackie Atkinson United Kingdom
Lucie Pokludová Czechia
David C. Speksnijder Netherlands
Xavier Van Huffel Belgium
Jorge Pinto Ferreira United States
Mesfin Mathewos Ethiopia
Arzu Funda BAĞCIGİL Türkiye
J. Torren‐Edo Netherlands
Hermine V. Mkrtchyan United Kingdom
Chika C. Okafor United States
Laurel E. Redding relative to Jackie Atkinson United Kingdom Jackie Atkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Jackie Atkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laurel E. Redding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurel E. Redding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurel E. Redding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurel E. Redding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurel E. Redding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurel E. Redding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurel E. Redding. The network helps show where Laurel E. Redding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laurel E. Redding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laurel E. Redding Line = papers co-authored together Laurel E. Redding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008161
2 200982
3 201853
4 201342
5 201926
6 202124
7 201424
8 201323
9 202023
10 202323
11 201917
12 201917
13 201415
14 202114
15 202112
16 202112
17 202111
18 202111
19 201911
20 202310

About Laurel E. Redding

Laurel E. Redding is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, Clinical Biochemistry, Small Animals and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial infections and disease research (10 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (9 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (9 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (8 papers), Gut microbiota and health (7 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers) and Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (79 citations), Molecular Medicine (66 citations), Equine (21 citations), Small Animals (86 citations) and Microbiology (67 citations). Laurel E. Redding has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Peru and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David B. Weiner, Joseph S. Bender, Linda D. Baker, Stephen D. Cole, Michael Z. Levy, David T. Galligan, Sean Hennessy, G. Richard Smith, Han Chang and Pinpin Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Journal of Dairy Science, American Journal of Veterinary Research and Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact