Laura Esmail

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 874 citations indexed

About

Laura Esmail is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Laura Esmail has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 874 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Laura Esmail's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (5 papers). Laura Esmail is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (5 papers). Laura Esmail collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Laura Esmail's co-authors include Alison Rein, Emily Moore, Scott D. Ramsey, David L. Veenstra, Patricia A. Deverka, Sean Tunis, Priyanka Desai, Danielle C. Lavallee, Jillian Clare Köhler and Mamuka Djibuti and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Care, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Qualitative Health Research.

In The Last Decade

Laura Esmail

17 papers receiving 848 citations

Hit Papers

Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Laura Esmail United States 12 601 198 168 86 68 17 874
Cynthia Vinson United States 14 770 1.3× 171 0.9× 286 1.7× 67 0.8× 58 0.9× 35 1.1k
Bec Hanley United Kingdom 15 790 1.3× 115 0.6× 235 1.4× 88 1.0× 48 0.7× 25 1.0k
Kathryn Paez United States 14 535 0.9× 284 1.4× 168 1.0× 138 1.6× 67 1.0× 25 1.0k
Richard J. Baron United States 17 530 0.9× 190 1.0× 201 1.2× 67 0.8× 48 0.7× 39 960
Liz Gill Australia 16 478 0.8× 201 1.0× 67 0.4× 121 1.4× 115 1.7× 29 966
Callie Walsh‐Bailey United States 17 966 1.6× 254 1.3× 119 0.7× 43 0.5× 50 0.7× 35 1.2k
Sara Ackerman United States 20 505 0.8× 124 0.6× 218 1.3× 124 1.4× 99 1.5× 75 1.1k
Janet Weiner United States 12 570 0.9× 416 2.1× 217 1.3× 76 0.9× 60 0.9× 45 1.3k
Anne Martin United Kingdom 14 468 0.8× 309 1.6× 137 0.8× 47 0.5× 33 0.5× 24 850
Teresa Finlay United Kingdom 10 710 1.2× 81 0.4× 370 2.2× 79 0.9× 48 0.7× 22 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Laura Esmail

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Esmail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Esmail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Esmail more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Esmail

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Esmail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Esmail. The network helps show where Laura Esmail may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura Esmail

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura Esmail. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura Esmail based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura Esmail. Laura Esmail is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Esmail, Laura, et al.. (2020). Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Journal of General Internal Medicine. 35(S2). 875–881. 25 indexed citations
2.
Heckert, Andrea, Laura P. Forsythe, Kristin L. Carman, et al.. (2020). Researchers, patients, and other stakeholders’ perspectives on challenges to and strategies for engagement. Research Involvement and Engagement. 6(1). 60–60. 61 indexed citations
3.
Hemphill, Rachel C., Laura P. Forsythe, Andrea Heckert, et al.. (2019). What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives: Qualitative survey findings. Health Expectations. 23(2). 328–336. 36 indexed citations
4.
Vandermause, Roxanne, et al.. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. Qualitative Health Research. 27(3). 434–442. 20 indexed citations
5.
Esmail, Laura, Emily Moore, & Alison Rein. (2015). Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 4(2). 133–145. 331 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Carlson, Josh J., Julie R. Gralow, N. Lynn Henry, et al.. (2013). Value-of-Information Analysis within a Stakeholder-Driven Research Prioritization Process in a US Setting: An Application in Cancer Genomics. Medical Decision Making. 33(4). 463–471. 26 indexed citations
7.
Wong, William B., Josh J. Carlson, Louis P. Garrison, et al.. (2012). Prioritization in Comparative Effectiveness Research. Medical Care. 50(5). 388–393. 15 indexed citations
8.
Esmail, Laura & Jillian Clare Köhler. (2012). The politics behind the implementation of the WTO Paragraph 6 Decision in Canada to increase global drug access. Globalization and Health. 8(1). 7–7. 6 indexed citations
9.
Esmail, Laura, et al.. (2012). Getting our priorities straight: a novel framework for stakeholder-informed prioritization of cancer genomics research. Genetics in Medicine. 15(2). 115–122. 11 indexed citations
10.
Deverka, Patricia A., Danielle C. Lavallee, Priyanka Desai, et al.. (2012). Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 1(2). 181–194. 228 indexed citations
11.
Carlson, Josh J., Scott D. Ramsey, Patricia A. Deverka, et al.. (2011). PCN9 VALUE OF RESEARCH ANALYSES IN RESEARCH PRIORITIZATION OF CANCER GENOMIC APPLICATIONS. Value in Health. 14(3). A156–A156. 1 indexed citations
12.
Hirsch, Bradford R., et al.. (2011). Informatics in Action. The Cancer Journal. 17(4). 235–238. 8 indexed citations
13.
Esmail, Laura, et al.. (2010). Framing access to medicines in developing countries: an analysis of media coverage of Canada's Access to Medicines Regime. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 10(1). 1–1. 21 indexed citations
14.
Djibuti, Mamuka, et al.. (2009). The role of supportive supervision on immunization program outcome - a randomized field trial from Georgia. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 9(S1). S11–S11. 59 indexed citations
15.
Esmail, Laura, et al.. (2007). Canada's implementation of the Paragraph 6 Decision: is it sustainable public policy?. Globalization and Health. 3(1). 12–12. 9 indexed citations
16.
Esmail, Laura, et al.. (2007). Human resource management in the Georgian National Immunization Program: a baseline assessment. Human Resources for Health. 5(1). 20–20. 14 indexed citations
17.
Esmail, Laura, et al.. (2007). Scientific misconduct, the pharmaceutical industry, and the tragedy of institutions.. PubMed. 26(3). 431–46. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026