Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013
2017554 citationsPeter Potapov, Matthew C. Hansen et al.Science Advancesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Lars Laestadius
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lars Laestadius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lars Laestadius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lars Laestadius more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lars Laestadius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lars Laestadius. The network helps show where Lars Laestadius may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lars Laestadius
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lars Laestadius.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lars Laestadius based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lars Laestadius. Lars Laestadius is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Potapov, Peter, Matthew C. Hansen, Lars Laestadius, et al.. (2017). The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Science Advances. 3(1). e1600821–e1600821.554 indexed citations breakdown →
Hanson, Craig, et al.. (2015). The Restoration Diagnostic.13 indexed citations
7.
Laestadius, Lars, et al.. (2014). Guide de la méthodologie d'évaluation des opportunités de restauration des paysages forestiers (MEOR). IUCN eBooks.
8.
Laestadius, Lars, et al.. (2014). Guía sobre la metodología de evaluación de oportunidades de restauración (ROAM). IUCN eBooks.1 indexed citations
9.
Laestadius, Lars, et al.. (2014). A guide to the Restoration Opportunities Assessment Methodology (ROAM). IUCN eBooks.7 indexed citations
10.
Laestadius, Lars, et al.. (2014). Sustainable Procurement of Wood and Paper-based Products.1 indexed citations
11.
Buckingham, Kathleen, Lars Laestadius, & Aurélio Padovezi. (2014). Taking Culture into Account in Restoring China’s Loess Plateau.1 indexed citations
12.
Laestadius, Lars, et al.. (2014). Guía sobre la metodología de evaluación de oportunidades de restauración (ROAM). Evaluación de las oportunidades de restauración del paisaje forestal a nivel nacional o subnacional.1 indexed citations
Sohngen, Brent, M. L. Gytarsky, G. N. Korovin, et al.. (2006). Stocks and Flows Carbon Inventory and Mitigation Potential of the Russian Forest and Land Base.9 indexed citations
17.
Laestadius, Lars, et al.. (2006). Mapping High Conservation Value Forests of Primorsky Kray, Russian Far East.1 indexed citations
18.
Laestadius, Lars, et al.. (2005). Stocks and Flows.7 indexed citations
19.
Laestadius, Lars, et al.. (2003). Canada's large intact forest landscapes 2003.15 indexed citations
20.
Laestadius, Lars, et al.. (2002). Atlas of Russia's Intact Forest Landscapes.50 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.