Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance
19881.2k citationsLars Calmfors, Seppo Honkapohja et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Lars Calmfors's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lars Calmfors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lars Calmfors more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lars Calmfors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lars Calmfors. The network helps show where Lars Calmfors may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lars Calmfors
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lars Calmfors.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lars Calmfors based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lars Calmfors. Lars Calmfors is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Calmfors, Lars, et al.. (2011). Vad bör göras med arbetslöshetsförsäkringen. 6.
5.
Calmfors, Lars. (2011). Bara dåliga lösningar kvar.
6.
Calmfors, Lars. (2010). THE SWEDISH FISCAL POLICY COUNCIL – Experiences and Lessons. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.7 indexed citations
7.
Calmfors, Lars. (2010). The Role of Independent Fiscal Policy Institutions. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
8.
Calmfors, Lars. (2008). Kris i det svenska avtalssystemet.2 indexed citations
9.
Calmfors, Lars. (2007). Flexicurity : An Answer or a Question. European Policy Analysis. 6.4 indexed citations
10.
Calmfors, Lars. (2007). Comment on Charles Wyplosz: Fiscal policy councils—unlovable or just unloved?. 15.6 indexed citations
11.
Calmfors, Lars, Giancarlo Corsetti, Michael Devereux, et al.. (2006). EEAG Report on the European Economy 2006. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.10 indexed citations
12.
Calmfors, Lars & Giancarlo Corsetti. (2003). How to Reform Europe’s Fiscal Policy Framework. World Economy. 4(1). 109–116.10 indexed citations
13.
Calmfors, Lars, Anders Forslund, & Maria Hemström. (2002). Does Active Labour Market Policy Work? Lessons from the Swedish Experiences. Econstor (Econstor).15 indexed citations
14.
Holmlund, Bertil & Lars Calmfors. (2000). Unemployment and economic growth: a partial survey. 107–153.38 indexed citations
15.
Calmfors, Lars. (1999). Macroeconomic Policy, Wage Setting, and Employment--What Difference Does the EMU Make?. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
16.
Calmfors, Lars. (1998). Monetary Union and Precautionary Labor-Market Reform. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
Calmfors, Lars. (1994). Politiques actives du marché du travail et chômage - cadre d'analyse des aspects cruciaux de la conception des mesures. 7–52.1 indexed citations
19.
Calmfors, Lars. (1993). Centralisation des négociations de salaires et performances macro-économiques: une analyse. 171–206.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.