Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Preparing a collection of radiology examinations for distribution and retrieval
2015576 citationsDina Demner‐Fushman, Marc Kohli et al.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Associationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Laritza Rodriguez
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Laritza Rodriguez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laritza Rodriguez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laritza Rodriguez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laritza Rodriguez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laritza Rodriguez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laritza Rodriguez. The network helps show where Laritza Rodriguez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laritza Rodriguez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laritza Rodriguez.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laritza Rodriguez based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Laritza Rodriguez. Laritza Rodriguez is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Demner‐Fushman, Dina, James G. Mork, Willie J. Rogers, et al.. (2018). Finding medication doses in the liteature.. PubMed. 2018. 368–376.3 indexed citations
7.
Rodriguez, Laritza, et al.. (2017). Mining the literature for genes associated with placenta-mediated maternal diseases.. PubMed. 2017. 1498–1506.1 indexed citations
8.
Abacha, Asma Ben, et al.. (2016). A Hybrid Approach to Generation of Missing Abstracts in Biomedical Literature. International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1093–1100.1 indexed citations
9.
Roberts, Kirk, Laritza Rodriguez, Sonya E. Shooshan, & Dina Demner‐Fushman. (2016). Resource Classification for Medical Questions.. PubMed. 2016. 1040–1049.4 indexed citations
10.
Kilicoglu, Halil, Asma Ben Abacha, Yassine Mrabet, et al.. (2016). Annotating Named Entities in Consumer Health Questions. 3325–3332.10 indexed citations
Demner‐Fushman, Dina, Marc Kohli, Marc B. Rosenman, et al.. (2015). Preparing a collection of radiology examinations for distribution and retrieval. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 23(2). 304–310.576 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Rodriguez, Laritza, et al.. (2015). Automatic Classification of Structured Product Labels for Pregnancy Risk Drug Categories, a Machine Learning Approach.. PubMed. 2015. 1093–102.2 indexed citations
14.
Roberts, Kirk, Laritza Rodriguez, Sonya E. Shooshan, & Dina Demner‐Fushman. (2015). Automatic Extraction and Post-coordination of Spatial Relations in Consumer Language.. PubMed. 2015. 1083–92.5 indexed citations
15.
Bodenreider, Olivier & Laritza Rodriguez. (2014). Analyzing U.S. prescription lists with RxNorm and the ATC/DDD Index.. PubMed. 2014. 297–306.16 indexed citations
Winnenburg, Rainer, Laritza Rodriguez, Fiona Callaghan, et al.. (2013). Aligning Pharmacologic Classes Between MeSH and ATC.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.