893 total citations 53 papers, 467 citations indexed
About
Lance Strate is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory.
According to data from OpenAlex, Lance Strate has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 467 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Communication, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Lance Strate's work include Media, Communication, and Education (22 papers), Digital Games and Media (5 papers) and Social Media and Politics (4 papers). Lance Strate is often cited by papers focused on Media, Communication, and Education (22 papers), Digital Games and Media (5 papers) and Social Media and Politics (4 papers). Lance Strate collaborates with scholars based in United States. Lance Strate's co-authors include Gary Gumpert, Neil Postman and Sue Barnes and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Technology and Culture and Western Journal of Communication.
In The Last Decade
Lance Strate
41 papers
receiving
372 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Lance Strate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lance Strate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lance Strate more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lance Strate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lance Strate. The network helps show where Lance Strate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lance Strate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lance Strate.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lance Strate based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lance Strate. Lance Strate is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Strate, Lance. (2012). If It's Neutral, It's Not Technology.. Educational Technology archive. 52(1). 6–9.8 indexed citations
5.
Strate, Lance. (2012). THE MEDIUM AND MCLUHAN'S MESSAGE. Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University). 17(80).1 indexed citations
6.
Strate, Lance. (2012). El medio y el mensaje de McLuhan: La tecnología, extensión y amputación del ser humano. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 61–80.3 indexed citations
7.
Strate, Lance. (2010). On the Binding Biases of Time: An Essay on General Semantics, Media Ecology, and the Past, Present, and Future of the Human Species. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics. 67(4). 360.2 indexed citations
8.
Strate, Lance. (2009). The Future of Consciousness. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics. 66(1). 63.3 indexed citations
9.
Strate, Lance. (2009). Tolkiens of My Affection. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics. 66(3). 278.1 indexed citations
10.
Strate, Lance. (2008). Studying Media AS Media: McLuhan and the Media Ecology Approach. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.49 indexed citations
Strate, Lance, et al.. (2002). Communication and Cyberspace: Social Interaction in an Electronic Environment. Medical Entomology and Zoology.82 indexed citations
20.
Strate, Lance. (1994). Post(modern)man, or Neil Postman as a Postmodernist.. 51(2). 159.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.