Laetitia M.O. de Kort
- Urology top 0.5%
- Rheumatology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Tom P.V.M. de JongJ.L.H. Ruud BoschPaul W. VeenboerF AsbeckJackie BoschCuno S.P.M. UiterwaalAart J. KlijnPetra de Graaf
- Topics
- Urological Disorders and Treatments (37 papers)Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (28 papers)Pelvic floor disorders treatments (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Laetitia M.O. de Kort
67 papers receiving 885 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Urology 598
- Rheumatology 301
- Surgery 293
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 245
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 117
Countries citing papers authored by Laetitia M.O. de Kort
This map shows the geographic impact of Laetitia M.O. de Kort's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laetitia M.O. de Kort with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laetitia M.O. de Kort more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laetitia M.O. de Kort
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laetitia M.O. de Kort. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laetitia M.O. de Kort. The network helps show where Laetitia M.O. de Kort may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laetitia M.O. de Kort
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laetitia M.O. de Kort. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laetitia M.O. de Kort based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laetitia M.O. de Kort. Laetitia M.O. de Kort is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 65 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Laetitia M.O. de Kort
Laetitia M.O. de Kort is a scholar working on Urology, Rheumatology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 899 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urological Disorders and Treatments (37 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (28 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (598 citations), Rheumatology (301 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (245 citations). Laetitia M.O. de Kort has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom P.V.M. de Jong, J.L.H. Ruud Bosch, Paul W. Veenboer, F Asbeck, Jackie Bosch, Cuno S.P.M. Uiterwaal, Aart J. Klijn, Petra de Graaf, M.T.W.T. Lock and Sybren P. Rynja. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.