L. Ulas Biter
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Gastroenterology top 5%
Papers in ⓘ
- Pharmacy 8
- Obesity and Health Practices 8
-
- Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment 7
- Co-authors
- Guido H. H. Mannaerts (15 shared papers)Martin Dunkelgrün (22 shared papers)Jan A. Apers (16 shared papers)Manuel Castro Cabezas (12 shared papers)Ralph P. M. Gadiot (7 shared papers)Pieter S. Hiemstra (2 shared papers)Christian Taube (2 shared papers)Erik Oudman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Obesity Surgery (19 papers)Injury (3 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)BMC Obesity (2 papers)Surgical Endoscopy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited Arab EmiratesUnited States
In The Last Decade
L. Ulas Biter
46 papers receiving 962 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Pharmacy 81
- Gastroenterology 83
- Surgery 657
- Rehabilitation 95
- Physiology 325
Countries citing papers authored by L. Ulas Biter
This map shows the geographic impact of L. Ulas Biter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Ulas Biter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Ulas Biter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. Ulas Biter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Ulas Biter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Ulas Biter. The network helps show where L. Ulas Biter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. Ulas Biter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 145 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 102 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 67 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 55 | |
| 7 | Long-term effect of sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in people living with severe obesity: a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial (SleeveBypass) Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 34 |
| 8 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 13 |
About L. Ulas Biter
L. Ulas Biter is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Rehabilitation, Surgery, Gastroenterology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 979 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (28 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (13 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (8 papers), Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (7 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (7 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (7 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (81 citations), Gastroenterology (83 citations), Surgery (657 citations), Rehabilitation (95 citations) and Physiology (325 citations). L. Ulas Biter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Arab Emirates and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guido H. H. Mannaerts, Martin Dunkelgrün, Jan A. Apers, Manuel Castro Cabezas, Ralph P. M. Gadiot, Pieter S. Hiemstra, Christian Taube, Erik Oudman, Jan W. Wijnia and Astrid van Huisstede. Their work appears in journals such as Obesity Surgery, Injury, BMJ Open, BMC Obesity and Surgical Endoscopy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.