L. P. Jager
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Physiology
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- E. E. DanielJennifer JuryA.J. BaarsJ. van NoordwijkMathur KannanMadhuvanthi KannanE. J. van der MolenA. den Hertog
- Topics
- Ion channel regulation and function (11 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers)Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (5 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of PhysiologyJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental TherapeuticsBritish Journal of Pharmacology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsCanadaCzechia
In The Last Decade
L. P. Jager
38 papers receiving 550 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Molecular Biology 202
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 141
- Physiology 113
- Gastroenterology 95
- Surgery 78
Countries citing papers authored by L. P. Jager
This map shows the geographic impact of L. P. Jager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. P. Jager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. P. Jager more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. P. Jager
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. P. Jager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. P. Jager. The network helps show where L. P. Jager may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. P. Jager
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. P. Jager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. P. Jager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. P. Jager. L. P. Jager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 68 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 69 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | The nictitating membrane/superior cervical ganglion preparation of the rabbit. | 2 |
| 20 | 27 |
About L. P. Jager
L. P. Jager is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Physiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 38 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (95 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (141 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (47 citations). L. P. Jager has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include E. E. Daniel, Jennifer Jury, A.J. Baars, J. van Noordwijk, Mathur Kannan, Madhuvanthi Kannan, E. J. van der Molen, A. den Hertog, M.J.A. Nabuurs and H. Esselink. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and British Journal of Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.